Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Dissident <qqqq@7600.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Position statement - Charles Casey's wife was no better thana prostitute.
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:31:35 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Comcast Online
Lines: 18
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <40783DD3.1030500@7600.net>
References: <c58g9k$nck$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1081621895 57528 128.100.83.246 (10 Apr 2004 18:31:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:31:35 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.169.240
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3148
Uncle Davey wrote:
> If Charles Casey's wife was only good to him and a wife to him when he was
> well and able to provide, and then divorced him and had him put out on the
> street when he was unwell, then she was no better than a hooker, and the
> elders who enabled her to do it, they were like her pimps.
>
> And you can quote me on that.
>
> Uncle Davey
It's long been known that ALL marriages are simply long-term
prostitution contracts. Ann Landers said it best in her
column many years ago when she cautioned a young woman against
giving away sex for free pre-maritally by saying "why buy a
cow when you can get the milk for free".
And you can quote me on that.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|