Ariaan Blok, ordinary guy wrote:
> RainLover wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 19:41:59 +0100, "Ariaan Blok, ordinary guy"
>> <bloke444GEEN@HAMzonnet.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> RainLover wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 12:50:31 +0100, "Piorokrat"
>>>> <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> With all one line, leading questions aside, you are referring to
>>>>>>> an ancient law that was:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a) clearly for the ancient Israelites
>>>>>>> b) fulfilled by Jesus Christ's perfect sacrifice on the cross
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then why do you use the Old Testament to persecute homosexuals?
>>>>>> He is saying that the Old Testament is the source of much
>>>>>> persecution. In any event, you are making a point in hypocricy,
>>>>>> don't you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuality is a breach of a creation ordinance, as is keeping
>>>>> one day in seven as a day of rest, the estate of marriage and the
>>>>> command to go forth and multiply. These things refer to all
>>>>> mankind, and were never intended just for Jews.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm glad to see you're a GOOD christian. This means you also will
>>>> stone your son to death if he talks back, NEVER eat shellfish, and
>>>> Most Certainly never wear clothes of Mixed fiber... lycra,
>>>> poly-cotton blends, polypropolyn, etc. . .
>>>>
>>>> James, Seattle
>>>
>>> You haven't really read the Bible, have you, James?
>>>
>>> Ariaan
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I have read the bible. I'll admit to skipping the 'begot'
>> chapter though.
>
> Okay, that is a minor sin. Although I always find it interesting to
> read what peoples have evolved from Noah, Abraham etc.
>
>> I wish you would have actually responded to the meat of my post, not
>> just make some flip comment about me... a person you know NOTHING
>> about..
>>
>> James, Seattle.
>
> Well, your remark doesn't show any real studying of the matter,
> otherwise you would know that there are moral laws we still have to
> follow, while all the shellfish and mixed fiber stuff is not for us,
> gentiles, anymore. If you had read your Bible carefully, you would
> have known that. Then you wouldn't have come with that worn-out
> argument about the shellfish & co, because that really doesn't go
> here. Besides, who are you to complain, your remark didn't show much
> intelligence either.
>
> But I'm happy to discuss this, nonetheless.
>
> Ariaan
I take that back. I'm not going to discuss this with you. Read the other
threads.
Ariaan
|
|