RainLover wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 19:41:59 +0100, "Ariaan Blok, ordinary guy"
> <bloke444GEEN@HAMzonnet.nl> wrote:
>
>> RainLover wrote:
>>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 12:50:31 +0100, "Piorokrat"
>>> <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> With all one line, leading questions aside, you are referring to
>>>>>> an ancient law that was:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a) clearly for the ancient Israelites
>>>>>> b) fulfilled by Jesus Christ's perfect sacrifice on the cross
>>>>>
>>>>> Then why do you use the Old Testament to persecute homosexuals? He
>>>>> is saying that the Old Testament is the source of much
>>>>> persecution. In any event, you are making a point in hypocricy,
>>>>> don't you think?
>>>>
>>>> Homosexuality is a breach of a creation ordinance, as is keeping
>>>> one day in seven as a day of rest, the estate of marriage and the
>>>> command to go forth and multiply. These things refer to all
>>>> mankind, and were never intended just for Jews.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm glad to see you're a GOOD christian. This means you also will
>>> stone your son to death if he talks back, NEVER eat shellfish, and
>>> Most Certainly never wear clothes of Mixed fiber... lycra,
>>> poly-cotton blends, polypropolyn, etc. . .
>>>
>>> James, Seattle
>>
>> You haven't really read the Bible, have you, James?
>>
>> Ariaan
>>
>
> Yes, I have read the bible. I'll admit to skipping the 'begot'
> chapter though.
Okay, that is a minor sin. Although I always find it interesting to read
what peoples have evolved from Noah, Abraham etc.
> I wish you would have actually responded to the meat of my post, not
> just make some flip comment about me... a person you know NOTHING
> about..
>
> James, Seattle.
Well, your remark doesn't show any real studying of the matter, otherwise
you would know that there are moral laws we still have to follow, while all
the shellfish and mixed fiber stuff is not for us, gentiles, anymore. If you
had read your Bible carefully, you would have known that. Then you wouldn't
have come with that worn-out argument about the shellfish & co, because that
really doesn't go here. Besides, who are you to complain, your remark didn't
show much intelligence either.
But I'm happy to discuss this, nonetheless.
Ariaan
|
|