Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: eris@io.com (Clay Colwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: How do homosexuals feel about Christian attitude towards them?
Date: 27 Oct 2003 05:33:04 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <f415da82.0310270533.3953f5d5@posting.google.com>
References: <tkklnvk944qbaku4p0iidtqkfdm2s28jdp@4ax.com> <f415da82.0310211146.56f73493@posting.google.com> <bn5hq7$b3b$2@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3F96F8D0.4060404@noSpamThanks.net> <bn8v5l$9to$3@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <19f5d6de.0310231831.4a2ff000@posting.google.com> <f415da82.0310240734.63b99364@posting.google.com> <j2fmb.13369$EO3.6480@clgrps13> <vuhmb.12037$n03.1170992@zonnet-reader-1> <pan.2003.10.25.01.51.18.11623@postini.spamcon.org> <19f5d6de.0310242336.608af45e@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.189.40.222
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1067261585 1845 127.0.0.1 (27 Oct 2003 13:33:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:33:05 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:256
HitherandYon@msn.com (The Nice Mean Man) wrote in message news:<19f5d6de.0310242336.608af45e@posting.google.com>...
> Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.10.25.01.51.18.11623@postini.spamcon.org>...
[...]
> > In short, loving and committed homosexual relationships are not condemned
> > in the Bible.
>
> That's ridiculous. Of course your perverted "loving and committed"
> unions weren't condemned in particular.... Homosexual behaviour was
> condemned in general!
There are all sorts of "homosexual behavior", just as there are all
sort of "heterosexual behavior", from loving relationships to incest
and rape.
And, no, homosexual behavior is *not* "condemned in general", as much
as you and your buddies insist otherwise.
> God didn't need to go thru each and every
> perverse degenerate deviant behaviour individually. He had a word for
> them all... Abomination.
It seemed bound and determined to detail a variety of heterosexual
behaviors that are perverse and degenerate individually. Is it
because heterosexuals need so much more supervision?
> > They couldn't have been, because the concept was completely
> > foreign to the Bible's authors.
>
>
> It was completely foreign to them because they lived in a society
> that was far closer to God's laws than we are today. Homosexuality was
> seen for what it was and still is.... an abomination in the eyes of
> the Creator. The penalty the homosexual paid for engaging in his act
> of abomination was death by stoning.
Ah. I see.
Assuming your interpretation is correct, do you want to go back to
the "good ol' days"?
> They understood. Sin must be stamped out before it can get hold and
> spread and grow. When something as vile and unnatural as homosexuality
> is 'decriminialized', you can be sure that other more evil and vile
> behaviours will soon follow. They knew it then just like the vast
> majority of us know it today. The only difference is, they listend to
> God and followed His laws. We listen to the special interest groups
> and follow their laws.
Oh yeah, justice and equality (which still haven't been fully meted out)
is *such* a burden for modern humanity to deal with.
So tell us: do you have your stockpile of boulders just itchin' to
show a fag who his due is?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 |
|