On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:36:22 -0700, HitherandYon@msn.com (The Nice Mean
Man) wrote in message
news:<19f5d6de.0310242336.608af45e@posting.google.com>:
> Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
> news:<pan.2003.10.25.01.51.18.11623@postini.spamcon.org>...
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:13:50 +0200, "Ariaan Blok, ordinary guy"
>> <bloke444GEEN@HAMzonnet.nl> wrote in message
>> news:<vuhmb.12037$n03.1170992@zonnet-reader-1>:
>>
>> > Hi la n.,
>> >
>> > I consider myself a friend of Uncle Davey's as well (if he feels
>> > differently, then blast him!). Anyway, I agree with you that
>> > homosexuality is an inborn thing. But I don't agree with your
>> > assuming that God has created homosexuality. I believe that every
>> > baby is not a new creation, but simply a result or extention if you
>> > will of the current or basic creation, in this case the man Adam and
>> > the woman Eve. God made them perfect, programmed their genes perfect,
>> > but since their fall they and their genes became imperfect, which has
>> > resulted in our body's decay and also in the occasional occurrence of
>> > a different sexual orientation. Do you see this differently?
>>
>> This is a pretty screwed up view you have here. Have you read the
>> website I gave you yet?
>>
>> http://www.godmademegay.com
>>
>>
>
>> In short, loving and committed homosexual relationships are not
>> condemned in the Bible.
>
> That's ridiculous. Of course your perverted "loving and committed"
> unions weren't condemned in particular.... Homosexual behaviour was
> condemned in general! God didn't need to go thru each and every perverse
> degenerate deviant behaviour individually. He had a word for them all...
> Abomination.
Not true. Every time homosexual behavior is condemned in the New
Testament, it is in the context of lustful relationships.
And if you want to talk about abominations, eating shellfish is an
abomination according to Leviticus. So I guess you won't be going to Red
Lobster any more, eh?
>> They couldn't have been, because the concept was completely foreign to
>> the Bible's authors.
>
>
> It was completely foreign to them because they lived in a society
> that was far closer to God's laws than we are today. Homosexuality was
> seen for what it was and still is.... an abomination in the eyes of the
> Creator. The penalty the homosexual paid for engaging in his act of
> abomination was death by stoning.
> They understood. Sin must be stamped out before it can get hold and
> spread and grow. When something as vile and unnatural as homosexuality
> is 'decriminialized', you can be sure that other more evil and vile
> behaviours will soon follow. They knew it then just like the vast
> majority of us know it today. The only difference is, they listend to
> God and followed His laws. We listen to the special interest groups and
> follow their laws.
This is just so utterly ridiculous that I am not even going to bother
responding to it. Look up "slippery slope" arguments and get back to me.
--
Funny Sister Lurlean quote #56:
"I know that most of them Mexicans got smegma on account of I can smell it for
myself."
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 |
|