On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 23:01:42 +0000 (UTC),
Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>
> news:8hed20hlp456h6toc4on1ddn18gqdhkbnv@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:04:28 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
>> <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ryan wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>First of all, this story about all cultures having flood myths is
> false.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I said most every nation.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What about the rest. They miss that flood? They sleep through it or
>> >> somwthing? They thought that the destruction of the entire human race
>> >> other than 11 people wasn't worth remembering?
>> >>
>> >
>> >They probably had scoffers like you who didn't believe it any more
> because
>> >no pictorial evidence had been left over.
>> >
>>
>> pictorial evidence? why qualify it that way. more accurate to say
>> 'they don't beleive it because there is no evidence for it'
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > LEGENDS OF THE FLOOD
>> >> > Eric Lyons, M.Min. and Kyle Butt, M.A.
>> >> >
>> >> > Anthropologists who study legends and folktales from different
>> >geographical
>> >> > locations and cultures consistently have reported one particular
> group
>> >of
>> >> > legends that is common to practically every civilization.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Uh, dragons?
>> >>
>> >
>> >There probably were dragons.
>> >
>> >And unicorns.
>> >
>>
>> and geologists have been able to consistently report that many
>> different geographical locations have had localized flooding.
>>
>> what makes you say there probably were dragons? because there are
>> stories about them? so if its in a bunch of stories its probably
>> true? is that what you base your analysis of history on, rumours, and
>> rumours of rumours?
>> snip
>>
>
> There are dragon accounts from all over the world.
>
> Can they all be wrong?
Yes.
--
Aaron Clausen
tao_of_cow/\alberni.net (replace /\ with @)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|