news:8hed20hlp456h6toc4on1ddn18gqdhkbnv@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:04:28 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
> <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Ryan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>First of all, this story about all cultures having flood myths is
false.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I said most every nation.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What about the rest. They miss that flood? They sleep through it or
> >> somwthing? They thought that the destruction of the entire human race
> >> other than 11 people wasn't worth remembering?
> >>
> >
> >They probably had scoffers like you who didn't believe it any more
because
> >no pictorial evidence had been left over.
> >
>
> pictorial evidence? why qualify it that way. more accurate to say
> 'they don't beleive it because there is no evidence for it'
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > LEGENDS OF THE FLOOD
> >> > Eric Lyons, M.Min. and Kyle Butt, M.A.
> >> >
> >> > Anthropologists who study legends and folktales from different
> >geographical
> >> > locations and cultures consistently have reported one particular
group
> >of
> >> > legends that is common to practically every civilization.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Uh, dragons?
> >>
> >
> >There probably were dragons.
> >
> >And unicorns.
> >
>
> and geologists have been able to consistently report that many
> different geographical locations have had localized flooding.
>
> what makes you say there probably were dragons? because there are
> stories about them? so if its in a bunch of stories its probably
> true? is that what you base your analysis of history on, rumours, and
> rumours of rumours?
> snip
>
There are dragon accounts from all over the world.
Can they all be wrong?
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|