On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:04:28 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
<noway@jose.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Ryan wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >>First of all, this story about all cultures having flood myths is false.
>> >
>> >
>> > I said most every nation.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> What about the rest. They miss that flood? They sleep through it or
>> somwthing? They thought that the destruction of the entire human race
>> other than 11 people wasn't worth remembering?
>>
>
>They probably had scoffers like you who didn't believe it any more because
>no pictorial evidence had been left over.
>
pictorial evidence? why qualify it that way. more accurate to say
'they don't beleive it because there is no evidence for it'
>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > LEGENDS OF THE FLOOD
>> > Eric Lyons, M.Min. and Kyle Butt, M.A.
>> >
>> > Anthropologists who study legends and folktales from different
>geographical
>> > locations and cultures consistently have reported one particular group
>of
>> > legends that is common to practically every civilization.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Uh, dragons?
>>
>
>There probably were dragons.
>
>And unicorns.
>
and geologists have been able to consistently report that many
different geographical locations have had localized flooding.
what makes you say there probably were dragons? because there are
stories about them? so if its in a bunch of stories its probably
true? is that what you base your analysis of history on, rumours, and
rumours of rumours?
snip
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|