>
>
> Uncle Davey wrote:
>
> >
> >>
> >>Uncle Davey wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>I cannot address creationist claims that differ from mine, as there
is
> >>>>>more than one way to envisage even a literal interpretation of
> >>>>>Genesis.
> >>
> >>
> >>How do we tell which of these different interpretations is right, Davey.
> >> Why is YOUR literal interpretation more authoritative than any of the
> >>others, Davey.
> >>
> >
> >
> > You'll just have to work that one out for yourself.
>
>
>
>
> Indeed. That is true for EVERYONE.
>
> And take note ---- no one needs YOU to help with that. You are not
> god;'s messenger, not god's spokesman, not god's policeman, and not
> god's translator. So stop shoving your self-righteous prideful
> arroigant holier-than-everyone ass in between everyone else and god. No
> one asked you to butt in. So butt out.
>
>
Make me.
>
>
>
> >
> > I can lead a horse to water, but I can't make it drink.
>
>
>
> And why again are YOU the one to decide which pond to lead it to, Davey?
>
>
Because if it were left to you, Lenny, that horse is gonna die of thirst.
Uncle Davey
--
"To my mind, Davey, you are the most mischievous and dangerous kind of
Creationist. ... You even know the holes in the knowledge of the study of
language, and you can use the terminology to great effect. People ...
seeing
your essay, would likely fall for it hook, line and sinker. Because it
mixes fact
and myth so very well, you give it an air of plausibility."
Aaron Clausen (02/02/2004)
Read some more on www.usenetposts.com
Play me at halma, reversi, backgammon and other games on
www.itsyourturn.com user name = "Uncle Davey"
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
|