>
>
> Jerzy Jakubowski wrote:
>
> >
> > I would put the Beginning, for the sake of argument, at nearly ten
> > thousand years ago. It's a nice round number.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Why not one thousand yeasr ago. That's also a nice round number. Or a
> hundred thousand yeras ago. Also a n ice round number. A million yeras
> ago? Ten million years ago?
>
>
>
> Do you have any evdience for a 10,000 year old earth (other than your
> say-so)? No? Then why shoudl we give a flying fuck HOW old you think
> it is?
>
>
If you want to believe it was a thousand years ago, then what about the fact
that we have detailed history going back longer than that?
A hundred thousand years ago is ten times longer than we actually need.
>
>
> >
> >>>I don't believe that things that speciate can cross these kinds, and
> >>>that becomes then the definition of the Kind.
> >>
> >>It doesn't matter what you believe.
> >
> >
> > I don't know why you ask me then, if it doesn't matter.
>
>
>
>
> I believe that speciations CAN cross these kinds.
>
>
> Why is my belief wrong and your belief is right (other than your say-so).
>
>
Show me a speciation crossing a kind, and your belief will be right, and
I'll have to do a re-think.
>
>
> >
> >
> >>Anyone can say that they believe
> >>that the universe began last Thursday, and that would be impossible to
> >>falsify.
> >
> >
> > There we are then. You admit you can't disprove my faith.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> And you can't disprove Sun Myung Moon's faith that he is the Son of God
> and the Younger Brother of Jesus. <shrug>
>
> So what.
>
>
So nothing. If he's right, then we're both done for. All I can do is believe
he isn't.
I can't prove it.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
|