Jerzy Jakubowski wrote:
>
> I would put the Beginning, for the sake of argument, at nearly ten
> thousand years ago. It's a nice round number.
>
>
Why not one thousand yeasr ago. That's also a nice round number. Or a
hundred thousand yeras ago. Also a n ice round number. A million yeras
ago? Ten million years ago?
Do you have any evdience for a 10,000 year old earth (other than your
say-so)? No? Then why shoudl we give a flying fuck HOW old you think
it is?
>
>>>I don't believe that things that speciate can cross these kinds, and
>>>that becomes then the definition of the Kind.
>>
>>It doesn't matter what you believe.
>
>
> I don't know why you ask me then, if it doesn't matter.
I believe that speciations CAN cross these kinds.
Why is my belief wrong and your belief is right (other than your say-so).
>
>
>>Anyone can say that they believe
>>that the universe began last Thursday, and that would be impossible to
>>falsify.
>
>
> There we are then. You admit you can't disprove my faith.
>
And you can't disprove Sun Myung Moon's faith that he is the Son of God
and the Younger Brother of Jesus. <shrug>
So what.
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
|