news:ab0de77f.0402051740.11d1943@posting.google.com...
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:<bvu5si$p75$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > news:ab0de77f.0402021659.13073099@posting.google.com...
> > > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > news:<bvj9sj$quu$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R.Schenck wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > But hyopthetically, how would it change things -if- the ice cap
melt
> > > > > > was sufficient to cover the mountains on the modern earth?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Davey is apparently too stupid to know that the north pole ice cap
is
> > > > > floating on sea water, and if the entire thing were to melt
tomorrow,
> > it
> > > > > would not raise the sea level AT ALL.
> > > > >
> > > > > He's also apparently too stupid to know that if all the ice on the
> > > > > planet --- every cubic inch of it --- were to melt tomorrow, it
STILL
> > > > > would not be enough to cover the earth.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just as Davey is apparently too stupid to know that the "moon
dust"
> > > > > argument was a pile of shit that even CREATIONISTS have been
begging
> > > > > people not to use because it makes creationists look stupid.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Davey is, apparently, not very bright.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > You asked were the flood water went, and I told you.
> > > >
> > > > I could also have told you that mountains arose as a result of the
rapid
> > > > continental drift that started during the flood but which hasn't
stopped
> > > > even yet, although now it's slowed down almost to stopping. That was
> > what at
> > > > one point threw up higher land and salinated the seas after enough
> > > > groundwater and ice was saved.
> > > >
> > > > There is no mention of mountains prior to the flood.
> > >
> > > There is no mention of *lots* of things in the Bible, are you
> > > suggesting that if the Bible doesn't mention something it never
> > > existed?
> > >
> > > Isn't it convenient how creationists can interpret the Bible to mean
> > > anything they want!
> > >
> >
> > It seems pretty clear from Gen 7 vv 19-20 that what they called
mountains
> > then were very small in comparison to today's mountains.
>
> In which area? How did this bunch of middle-eastern goat-hearders know
> about the height of mountains on the rest of the planet? Does the
> Bible mention that?
>
> EROS.
The Bible was written by God's inspiration, and He must have known how high
they were.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 |
|