Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: nygdan_morteauxspam@yahoo.com (R.Schenck)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: A question for Mormons
Date: 6 Feb 2004 07:09:25 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 91
Message-ID: <8fcb1069.0402060709.47cc67fc@posting.google.com>
References: <bvlf8h$13m$0@pita.alt.net> <bvll6n$tiu1e$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <bvlver$32k$0@pita.alt.net> <bvm28o$ua9vl$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <bvm6e5$h5o$0@pita.alt.net> <bvnk0k$u76i8$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <bvnr3u$qps$0@pita.alt.net> <bvo03o$u6pi8$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <b9b3de8.0402040730.6df882d6@posting.google.com> <bvrced$vs7uj$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <b9b3de8.0402051008.7c019deb@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.208.6.35
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1076080165 28288 127.0.0.1 (6 Feb 2004 15:09:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2205
branchofjesse@hotmail.com (Jerzy Jakubowski) wrote in message news:<b9b3de8.0402051008.7c019deb@posting.google.com>...
> "Andrew R" <adr.notme@sarcastic.co.uk> wrote in message news:<bvrced$vs7uj$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> > "Jerzy Jakubowski" <branchofjesse@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:b9b3de8.0402040730.6df882d6@posting.google.com...
> > > "Andrew R" <adr.notme@sarcastic.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:<bvo03o$u6pi8$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> > > > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:bvnr3u$qps$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > news:bvnk0k$u76i8$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:bvm6e5$h5o$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you an elder?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FYI, as if it matters here, I am a High Priest.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you be touched with the feeling of our infirmities?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Another question that leaves more to interpretation than I care to
> bother
> > > > with. What are you asking?
> > > >
> > > > <Snip>
> > > >
> > > > > > Well then not really a question at all - your just trying to encite
> some
> > > > > > sort of argument.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I never!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Never what?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, do you agree with Brigham Young that it is wrong for whites and
> blacks
> > > > > to intermarry?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Wrong? On what level. Do I believe that the marriage of a black and
> white
> > > > couple, sealed in the temple, is not honoured by God? No, I do not
> believe
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > Do I believe that that would have been the case in BY's day - well yes,
> > > > since they could not be sealed then.
> > > >
> > > > I believe that anyone who willingly puts their desires above God's will
> > > > suffer the consequences.
> > >
> > > So, are you black or white?
> >
> > I am white.
>
> I thought you might say that.
why, becuase he is a mormon or because he (foolishly) seems to think
races shouldn't mix? thats not a trait unit to 'whites'. as for the
mormon bit, i'd say that was a giveaway anyway.
>
> >
> > >
> > > And what consequences would God have given to a black couple who loved
> > > each other and married when Brigham Young said they couldn't?
> > >
> >
> > The consequence for anyone who marries someone to whom he/she can not be
> > sealed, is that they may never get the chance - and therefore not receive
> > the associated blessings.
> >
> > Andrew R.
>
> Never get what chance?
>
> What is 'sealed' and where do you find that word used of marriage in scripture?
>
doode you know these people have their own scripture and their own
revelations, so why pretend that they need support from your
scripture?
isn't interesting when fundies clash? fundomachy? bello intolerensis?
snip
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|