Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: eros_talk_origins@hotmail.com (Eros)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: zzzz
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 01:39:43 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 69
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <ab0de77f.0402051740.11d1943@posting.google.com>
References: <1g85zka.1k9v7n93kim2N%john.wilkins@bigpond.com> <mip810pse1acv792snqtipr1f45kj205v8@4ax.com> <2njo10l7iimlpv36dkfhit5n0guk9thkpc@4ax.com> <401c6a57$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bvj9sj$quu$0@pita.alt.net> <ab0de77f.0402021659.13073099@posting.google.com> <bvu5si$p75$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1076031583 57235 128.100.83.246 (6 Feb 2004 01:39:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 01:39:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.202.156.84
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2203
"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message news:<bvu5si$p75$0@pita.alt.net>...
> news:ab0de77f.0402021659.13073099@posting.google.com...
> > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> news:<bvj9sj$quu$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > R.Schenck wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > But hyopthetically, how would it change things -if- the ice cap melt
> > > > > was sufficient to cover the mountains on the modern earth?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Davey is apparently too stupid to know that the north pole ice cap is
> > > > floating on sea water, and if the entire thing were to melt tomorrow,
> it
> > > > would not raise the sea level AT ALL.
> > > >
> > > > He's also apparently too stupid to know that if all the ice on the
> > > > planet --- every cubic inch of it --- were to melt tomorrow, it STILL
> > > > would not be enough to cover the earth.
> > > >
> > > > Just as Davey is apparently too stupid to know that the "moon dust"
> > > > argument was a pile of shit that even CREATIONISTS have been begging
> > > > people not to use because it makes creationists look stupid.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Davey is, apparently, not very bright.
> > > >
> > >
> > > You asked were the flood water went, and I told you.
> > >
> > > I could also have told you that mountains arose as a result of the rapid
> > > continental drift that started during the flood but which hasn't stopped
> > > even yet, although now it's slowed down almost to stopping. That was
> what at
> > > one point threw up higher land and salinated the seas after enough
> > > groundwater and ice was saved.
> > >
> > > There is no mention of mountains prior to the flood.
> >
> > There is no mention of *lots* of things in the Bible, are you
> > suggesting that if the Bible doesn't mention something it never
> > existed?
> >
> > Isn't it convenient how creationists can interpret the Bible to mean
> > anything they want!
> >
>
> It seems pretty clear from Gen 7 vv 19-20 that what they called mountains
> then were very small in comparison to today's mountains.
In which area? How did this bunch of middle-eastern goat-hearders know
about the height of mountains on the rest of the planet? Does the
Bible mention that?
EROS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"No geologic difficulties, real or imagined, can be allowed to take
precedence over the clear statements and necessary inferences of
Scripture." -- Dr. Henry Morris (Institute for Creation Research)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 |
|