alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: A question for Mormons http://groups.google.com
Jerzy Jakubowski (branchofjesse@hotmail.com) 2004/02/05 11:08

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: branchofjesse@hotmail.com (Jerzy Jakubowski)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: A question for Mormons
Date: 5 Feb 2004 10:08:27 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <b9b3de8.0402051008.7c019deb@posting.google.com>
References: <bvlf8h$13m$0@pita.alt.net> <bvll6n$tiu1e$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <bvlver$32k$0@pita.alt.net> <bvm28o$ua9vl$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <bvm6e5$h5o$0@pita.alt.net> <bvnk0k$u76i8$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <bvnr3u$qps$0@pita.alt.net> <bvo03o$u6pi8$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de> <b9b3de8.0402040730.6df882d6@posting.google.com> <bvrced$vs7uj$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.7.184.12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1076004507 10522 127.0.0.1 (5 Feb 2004 18:08:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:08:27 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2189

"Andrew R" <adr.notme@sarcastic.co.uk> wrote in message news:<bvrced$vs7uj$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> "Jerzy Jakubowski" <branchofjesse@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b9b3de8.0402040730.6df882d6@posting.google.com...
> > "Andrew R" <adr.notme@sarcastic.co.uk> wrote in message
>  news:<bvo03o$u6pi8$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> > > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > > news:bvnr3u$qps$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > >

> > > > news:bvnk0k$u76i8$1@ID-105978.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:bvm6e5$h5o$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you an elder?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > FYI, as if it matters here, I am a High Priest.
> > > >
> > > > Can you be touched with the feeling of our infirmities?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Another question that leaves more to interpretation than I care to
>  bother
> > > with. What are you asking?
> > >
> > > <Snip>
> > >
> > > > > Well then not really a question at all - your just trying to encite
>  some
> > > > > sort of argument.
> > > >
> > > > Well, I never!
> > > >
> > >
> > > Never what?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, do you agree with Brigham Young that it is wrong for whites and
>  blacks
> > > > to intermarry?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Wrong? On what level. Do I believe that the marriage of a black and
>  white
> > > couple, sealed in the temple, is not honoured by God? No, I do not
>  believe
> > > that.
> > >
> > > Do I believe that that would have been the case in BY's day - well yes,
> > > since they could not be sealed then.
> > >
> > > I believe that anyone who willingly puts their desires above God's will
> > > suffer the consequences.
> >
> > So, are you black or white?
>
> I am white.

I thought you might say that.

>
> >
> > And what consequences would God have given to a black couple who loved
> > each other and married when Brigham Young said they couldn't?
> >
>
> The consequence for anyone who marries someone to whom he/she can not be
> sealed, is that they may never get the chance - and therefore not receive
> the associated blessings.
>
> Andrew R.

Never get what chance?

What is 'sealed' and where do you find that word used of marriage in scripture?

Best,

Uncle Davey

Follow-ups:12345678910111213141516171819
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite