Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: branchofjesse@hotmail.com (Jerzy Jakubowski)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: wwww
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:48:25 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 53
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <b9b3de8.0402050049.5ebab732@posting.google.com>
References: <laurieappieton-20040124035057.21792.00000635@mb-m06.aol.com> <bvicq9$232$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <892cb437.0402010651.5b31f70f@posting.google.com> <bvje91$lk8$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <892cb437.0402020645.66f5141b@posting.google.com> <cb5b2d4e.0402021542.4498bb00@posting.google.com> <bvnr46$qps$2@pita.alt.net> <OY%Tb.131360$f97.54913@fe3.columbus.rr.com> <pan.2004.02.04.07.01.16.512542@terralink.net> <pF8Ub.131864$f97.130763@fe3.columbus.rr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1075970905 38971 128.100.83.246 (5 Feb 2004 08:48:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:48:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.171.48.161
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2182
"Skitter The Cat" <Skitter_the_Cat@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<pF8Ub.131864$f97.130763@fe3.columbus.rr.com>...
> On 4-Feb-2004, "Daniel Harper" <daniel_harper@terralink.net> wrote:
>
> > Path:
<massive amounts of pointless header material snipped>
> >
> > Said it better than I did. In another post, I made the comment that, other
> > than his considerable knowledge of different languages, Uncle Davey has
> > had his ass handed to him on every issue he's attempted to put forth on
> > this newsgroup. And while most of the creationist posters around here
> > stick to a couple of claims and stick with 'em, Davey's been pretty
> > prolific, at least insofar as number of _different_ claims to be wrong
> > about is concerned.
>
> Agreed-and thank you for the compliment.
> >
> > He does so much harm to his cause, I can't imagine why he continues in
> > this vein.
>
> Again, I agree.
>
> I am beginning to wonder if he is simply a troll. I am not asserting that
> he is by any means; certainly, there are some of my fellow Christians who
> just make me want to pound my head into a spike in order to end the pain of
> reading their nonsense (whether it is Creationism, something hate-filled, or
> just really bad apologetics) and he might be just one of them. I do think
> it is possible, given his known history of deceit, that not even he believes
> any of his assertions or arguments. He may be just a prankster, or some
> anti-religious type bent on making Theists look bad.
>
> In the big, happy, dysfunctional family of Usenet-where the fringe meets the
> kooky-it gets difficult to tell the "real"ly wacky from the "virtual"ly
> wacky.
>
>
> Skitter the Cat
I'm sorry if I'm getting in the way of your witness, sister, but I
still have to tell things according to the way I see them.
Please don't get sanctimonious with me about the fact that I was wrong
in the Constance Vigilant matter. We all make mistakes. I think it is
not blessed for you to make a "history of deceit" out of that so that
you can carry on with your softly softly friendship evangelism without
being associated with the likes of me.
Best
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 |
|