"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message news:<bvj9sj$quu$0@pita.alt.net>...
> >
> >
> > R.Schenck wrote:
> >
> >
> > <snip>
> > > But hyopthetically, how would it change things -if- the ice cap melt
> > > was sufficient to cover the mountains on the modern earth?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Davey is apparently too stupid to know that the north pole ice cap is
> > floating on sea water, and if the entire thing were to melt tomorrow, it
> > would not raise the sea level AT ALL.
> >
> > He's also apparently too stupid to know that if all the ice on the
> > planet --- every cubic inch of it --- were to melt tomorrow, it STILL
> > would not be enough to cover the earth.
> >
> > Just as Davey is apparently too stupid to know that the "moon dust"
> > argument was a pile of shit that even CREATIONISTS have been begging
> > people not to use because it makes creationists look stupid.
> >
> >
> > Davey is, apparently, not very bright.
> >
>
> You asked were the flood water went, and I told you.
>
> I could also have told you that mountains arose as a result of the rapid
> continental drift that started during the flood but which hasn't stopped
> even yet, although now it's slowed down almost to stopping. That was what at
> one point threw up higher land and salinated the seas after enough
> groundwater and ice was saved.
>
> There is no mention of mountains prior to the flood.
There is no mention of *lots* of things in the Bible, are you
suggesting that if the Bible doesn't mention something it never
existed?
Isn't it convenient how creationists can interpret the Bible to mean
anything they want!
EROS.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Bible's accuracy will depend on how well you throw it."
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 |
|