Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Ariaan" <thisisagenuineaddresssopleaseomittheobvioustoreplyNOOOSPAM@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
References: <pan.2004.01.24.08.56.56.779392@cox.net> <xKqQb.12024$z03.9739@twister.socal.rr.com> <butm1j$uv8$0@pita.alt.net> <35fa3772.0401250054.4f8f8ef2@posting.google.com> <bv0urj$1lq$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <40143a26$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <1g85zka.1k9v7n93kim2N%john.wilkins@bigpond.com> <mip810pse1acv792snqtipr1f45kj205v8@4ax.com> <bv3iri$h7n$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <1g87xw3.1hvqcg613gk66xN%john.wilkins@bigpond.com> <bvgf61$p19$3@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <eugn10d73in5pj3fipk9up5ckfinbgs0hh@4ax.com> <bvgro3$5ff$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <401c1641_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
Subject: Re: Gastrich missed the debate deadline
Lines: 91
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <TSUSb.399001$_x2.843035@zonnet-reader-1>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:12:26 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.166.242.6
X-Complaints-To: abuse@zonnet.nl
X-Trace: zonnet-reader-1 1075583539 62.166.242.6 (Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:12:19 MET)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:12:19 MET
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2032
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank wrote:
> Uncle Davey wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:45:34 +0000 (UTC), in free.christians
>>> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in
>>> <bvgf61$p19$3@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>> If they all look alike to you, then you've probably been looking at
>>>> Haplochromis
>>>>
>>>> On the species blurring bit, I really don't have a problem. Kinds
>>>> are not crossed. Several genera, including the larger genera,
>>>> could all have been one Kind at the time of the Flood.
>>>
>>> Despite the fact that creationists refuse to give any testable
>>> definition of kind normally, your apparent definition of kind is
>>> impossible and inconsistent with the evidence.
>>>
>>> You also forgot that the evidence shows that there was no global
>>> flood.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Where did all that sand in the Sahara come from then?
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> BWA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> Good one, Davey. ROFLMAO!
>
>
> Oh wait . . . you mean you're NOT kidding . . . . ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> And also the evidence of global flood legends from all over the
>> world?
>
>
>
>
>
> (1) why don't any of those legends agree with each other, Davey.
'Cos of the evolution of mouth-to-mouth tales.
> (2) why don't desert people like the Berbers have a flood legend,
> Davey.
'Cos they forgot to write it down, and now can't remember it.
> (3) why was the Gilgamesh flood legend written long before the Bible's
> version, Davey.
Says them...
> (4) why isn't there any geological evidence of any global flood,
> Davey.
'Cos you didn't find any
> (5) why do old-earth creationists think all your flood evidence is a
> crock of shit, Davey.
Why do they call themselves 'creationist' anyway...
> (6) why should we care about your uninformed opinion on the matter
> anyway, Davey.
Well, I'd say that you're obviously a slacker with nothing better to do than
keep bugging people with the same dumb questions over and over again. So
that is what makes you care.
Ariaan
PS Yeah I know that it's a re-re-re-post
|
|