Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: the right-wing christian attitude.
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:40:48 +0100
Organization: Tadex Niejadex
Lines: 37
Sender: piorokrat@autograf.pl@pa252.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
Message-ID: <bvh49b$r3o$1@news.onet.pl>
References: <a52c1360.0401291350.4c61b3b2@posting.google.com> <bvg5na$2ct$0@pita.alt.net> <a52c1360.0401311156.3b93fd7a@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pa252.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Trace: news.onet.pl 1075582059 27768 213.76.96.252 (31 Jan 2004 20:47:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@onet.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Jan 2004 20:47:39 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2026
Uzytkownik "liberal shmiberal" <screw_yer_drug_war@yahoo.com> napisal w
wiadomosci news:a52c1360.0401311156.3b93fd7a@posting.google.com...
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:<bvg5na$2ct$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > "liberal shmiberal" <screw_yer_drug_war@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:a52c1360.0401291350.4c61b3b2@posting.google.com...
> > > im just wondering how some of you so-called conservatives can justify
> > > the "noble lie" straussian philosophy that the right-wing seems to
> > > follow and the "money first" attitude, and still claim to be
> > > christians
> >
> > Well, the thing is, nobody gives us food and lodging for free, so we
have to
> > earn and pay for it like everybody else.
> >
> > It won't always be that way, apparently.
> >
> > Uncle Davey
>
> well, uncle davey, i'm not sure what that has to do with despoiling
> the environment, corporate giveaways, smear campaigns against the
> opposition, revenge leaks to robert novak, or meaningless war in iraq,
> but i'll assume yer one of these crusty ole fukkers that fancies
> himself a "rugged individualist" when you're probably more like a slug
> with iron underpants that manages to hold down a job by manipulating
> opinion while goofing off, or taking it up the rear(figuratively
> and/or literally) from yer boss.
>
>
> can you say "self-righteous"?
Can you say "prejudiced"?
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|