Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Evolution - Blind Heart Surgery
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Tadex Niejadex
Lines: 54
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <bvgkjd$g1e$1@news.onet.pl>
References: <laurieappieton-20040124035057.21792.00000635@mb-m06.aol.com> <Xns947A4B5CBF133cheezitsnetzeronet@129.250.170.83> <butoq1$4hq$0@pita.alt.net> <7418dcc4.0401241026.5ed5e62@posting.google.com> <buuke4$o53$0@pita.alt.net> <sblb101kdfsqj3uuji1p2jrfs1j96v3hlu@4ax.com> <bvd0pc$jcp$3@news.onet.pl> <7418dcc4.0401300808.32f06081@posting.google.com> <g73l101gvaog9kqnme2f3ai2qhfos6vn2c@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1075566003 16106 128.100.83.246 (31 Jan 2004 16:20:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
Fake-Sender: piorokrat@autograf.pl@pa252.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pa252.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox6.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Dec 3 2003 15:07:19, 0.7/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 9301 i0VGKCP8009571 mailbox6.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2005
news:g73l101gvaog9kqnme2f3ai2qhfos6vn2c@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:08:47 +0000 (UTC), in free.christians
> broomhed@world.std.com (Ann Broomhead) wrote in
> <7418dcc4.0401300808.32f06081@posting.google.com>:
> >"Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote in message
news:<bvd0pc$jcp$3@news.onet.pl>...
> >
> >> Nice try, Jack, but I'm afraid unless you can show me what the common
> >> ancestor between Finno-Ugric and INdo-European, then evolution doesn't
apply
> >> to the origins of these language families. And if evolution can't
account
> >> for the rise of labguage families, then what does? How did those
language
> >> families come into being? What theory of them would be consistent with
what
> >> evolution claims about man's origins?
> >>
> >> This is an important question. It was also what this argument was about
when
> >> I brought it up. The architectural aside is the distractor, thrown in
by
> >> someone who couldn't answer the question, so she decided to change the
> >> question. Don't criticise my debating techniques, it was Anne Broomhead
who
> >> swept in with that one.
> >>
> >> Uncle Davey
> >
> >According to your claims about the Bible, all languages split when the
> >Tower of Babel was being built. This was, as I pointed out, no
> >earlier than the reign of Ur-Nammu (2112 - 2095 bce). Demonstrate to
> >us that Finno-Ugric and Indo-European date from this time (and no
> >earlier) as separate, and distinct languages.
> >
> >The Tower of Babel incident is your claim; you get to support it with
> >data.
> >
> >And how tall was the Tower of Babel supposed to be, anyhow?
>
> Tall enough to reach heaven, everyone knows that.
>
What is your evidence that this was 2112-2095 BC?
I think it was earlier than that.
What you refer to could have been an attempt to rebuild it.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 |
|