| Re: We win by innovation, not by protectionism |
|
| la n. (nilita2004@yahoo.comNOSPAM) |
2004/01/30 12:00 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "la n." <nilita2004@yahoo.comNOSPAM>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
References: <buudhp$lg23b$1@ID-138339.news.uni-berlin.de> <buui40$jse$0@pita.alt.net> <34ac1d46.0401261234.1da812ef@posting.google.com> <bv3v7s$o38kt$1@ID-138339.news.uni-berlin.de> <bvd0od$jcp$1@news.onet.pl>
Subject: Re: We win by innovation, not by protectionism
Lines: 84
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <XQxSb.6$6X2.4@clgrps13>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:00:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.180.57.141
X-Trace: clgrps13 1075489207 64.180.57.141 (Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:00:07 MST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:00:07 MST
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1988
"Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote in message
news:bvd0od$jcp$1@news.onet.pl...
>
> news:bv3v7s$o38kt$1@ID-138339.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > "Allisson" <allisson@panix.com> wrote in message
> > news:34ac1d46.0401261234.1da812ef@posting.google.com...
> > > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > news:<buui40$jse$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > > > "la n." <nilita2004nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:buudhp$lg23b$1@ID-138339.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > > < I'm extending the courtesy of adding ud's group since it
> > > > > behooves me to allow him to know that you gossipy old
> > > > > hens are going on about him >
> > >
> > > Thank you, mom.
> > >
> > > > Thank you very much, Nilo. I will reply on my own group. They
> > > > will see it well enough if they go on google. I have no wish to
> validate
> > > > traitorous scum like Seilerova et al by posting in thier own leetle
> > > > lubyanka.
> > >
> > > Since what I wrote was in soc.singles, I have added it back. Besides,
> > > I am replying to you not your 'social secretary' Nilo.
> > >
> > > > After all, afud is now on Google, which Outer Beauty was shrewd
enough
> > to
> > > > observe is the benchmark of a non-"phoney group".
> > >
> > > I remember that up until I aided Mike in outing Jack. You thought
> > > of me as "Inner Beauty;" since the only thing that changed was that
> > > decision I made to out him, then I imagine that your definition of
> > > what constitutes inner/outer beauty is dependent on if a person
> > > does something that displeases you or not.
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am thinking of adding illustrations to my website
> > > > www.jbc.nildram.co.uk/bosad.htm so if any one has jpegs they would
> like
> > to
> > > > dedicate to that venture, do let me know.
> > >
> > > I'll send you a .jpg of the twins after they're born.
> >
> > I am *not* Davey's secretary; but when people want to engage
> > in a public shitfest regarding an absentee person, I think that
> > person should be at the very least allowed to defend himself.
>
> That would seem logical, but she wasn't too happy about it, by the looks
of
> things.
Well, mayhaps some good will come of it.
>
> >
> > And, beyond that, congratulations Allison on your future
> > arrivals. Kids rock our world ... usually in the very best
> > way.
> >
> > la n.
> >
>
> I wonder whether mIKE jackston's money will save him now?
>
> Owwww!
>
> 100% peedo.
I can't wait until the new issue of Vanity Fair comes out.
Journalist Maureen Orth really does a hatchet job on
da man (?).
>
> Uncle Davey, the dauphin of loafin'.
>
la n. - bebedora de diet coke
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
|
|