Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: eros_talk_origins@hotmail.com (Eros)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: A short account of the possible history of human languages from Babel (was Re: Evolution - Blind Heart Surgery)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:18:45 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 41
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <ab0de77f.0401292218.3076200c@posting.google.com>
References: <laurieappieton-20040124035057.21792.00000635@mb-m06.aol.com> <Xns947A9BD5F8270ericvgillyahoocom@24.93.43.119> <buuvmq$cpc$0@pita.alt.net> <Xns947AAACC86676ericvgillyahoocom@24.93.43.121> <bv0jsq$6uk$2@news.onet.pl> <Xns947B7CBC12A9Cericvgillyahoocom@24.93.44.119> <bv13qe$7ej$1@news.onet.pl> <47c45a21.0401252152.227d4c19@posting.google.com> <bv3eev$7lr$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <ab0de77f.0401272216.396eeb1@posting.google.com> <b9b3de8.0401290517.2f22cb8d@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1075443525 77960 128.100.83.246 (30 Jan 2004 06:18:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:18:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.202.156.84
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox4.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Oct 30 2003 22:20:52, 0.1/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 34651 i0U6IO9g043120 mailbox4.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1971
branchofjesse@hotmail.com (Jerzy Jakubowski) wrote in message news:<b9b3de8.0401290517.2f22cb8d@posting.google.com>...
> eros_talk_origins@hotmail.com (Eros) wrote in message news:<ab0de77f.0401272216.396eeb1@posting.google.com>...
> > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message news:<bv3eev$7lr$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>...
> >
> > [snip childish linguistic fantasy]
> >
> > > > Incidently, even broader groups than Nostratic have been proposed,
> > > > including attempts to reconstruct words of Proto-World. Unfortunately
> > > > the only one I recall at the moment is rather indelicate.
> > >
> > > There's every chance that we can guess at a word that was in the vocabulary
> > > of somebody who walked out of Babel, maybe in a sound-shifted or abbreviated
> > > form. After all, all the material in every tribal or supertribal language
> > > came from someone or other's Babel exit language. It's not common for
> > > languages to invent words, so even 'shit' has good cognates in Greek. If we
> > > say that 'skata' is closer, because we can tell it didn't go through the
> > > Germanic sound shifts which we know all about thanks to Grimm, then we can
> > > ascert with a good probability of truth that some rather powerful man or his
> > > wife, with a penchant for talking about his or her bodily functions,
> > > received the ancestor word for 'skata/shit' in his or her personal language
> > > at Babel.
> >
> > My personal opinion is that your hypothesis is a load of 'shit'... I mean 'skata'!
>
> OK. So which alternative hypothesis do you find more convincing and why?
You don't even *have* a serious linguistic hypothesis, only wild
conjecture based on the presumption that the Bible stories are
correct. Trying to make all the facts fit a fundamentalist religious
mindset is hardly a scientific approach, is it!
I suggest you get your head out of the ancient texts and read up on
some modern scientific theories on the evolution of human language...
any good library would be a start.
EROS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There is not the slightest possibility that the *facts* of science
can contradict the Bible." -- Dr. Henry Morris (Institute for Creation
Research)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 |
|