branchofjesse@hotmail.com (Jerzy Jakubowski) wrote in message news:<b9b3de8.0401290517.2f22cb8d@posting.google.com>...
> eros_talk_origins@hotmail.com (Eros) wrote in message news:<ab0de77f.0401272216.396eeb1@posting.google.com>...
> > "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message news:<bv3eev$7lr$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>...
> >
> > [snip childish linguistic fantasy]
> >
> > > > Incidently, even broader groups than Nostratic have been proposed,
> > > > including attempts to reconstruct words of Proto-World. Unfortunately
> > > > the only one I recall at the moment is rather indelicate.
> > >
> > > There's every chance that we can guess at a word that was in the vocabulary
> > > of somebody who walked out of Babel, maybe in a sound-shifted or abbreviated
> > > form. After all, all the material in every tribal or supertribal language
> > > came from someone or other's Babel exit language. It's not common for
> > > languages to invent words, so even 'shit' has good cognates in Greek. If we
> > > say that 'skata' is closer, because we can tell it didn't go through the
> > > Germanic sound shifts which we know all about thanks to Grimm, then we can
> > > ascert with a good probability of truth that some rather powerful man or his
> > > wife, with a penchant for talking about his or her bodily functions,
> > > received the ancestor word for 'skata/shit' in his or her personal language
> > > at Babel.
> >
> > My personal opinion is that your hypothesis is a load of 'shit'... I mean 'skata'!
>
> OK. So which alternative hypothesis do you find more convincing and why?
You don't even *have* a serious linguistic hypothesis, only wild
conjecture based on the presumption that the Bible stories are
correct. Trying to make all the facts fit a fundamentalist religious
mindset is hardly a scientific approach, is it!
I suggest you get your head out of the ancient texts and read up on
some modern scientific theories on the evolution of human language...
any good library would be a start.
EROS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There is not the slightest possibility that the *facts* of science
can contradict the Bible." -- Dr. Henry Morris (Institute for Creation
Research)
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 | 32 | 33 |
|