branchofjesse@hotmail.com (Jerzy Jakubowski) wrote in message news:<b9b3de8.0401290006.6ad78a56@posting.google.com>...
> Pithecanthropus Erectus <tuibguy1@spam.earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<lgORb.414$F23.408@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
snip
>
> >
snip
>
> So, having attained to certain understandings, whose side are you
> gonna be on?
>
> God's? or science's?
>
> If you don't really believe in God, then obviously you will choose
> science.
>
> If you do, but have doubts, then you might still believe in science
> more.
>
> But salvation is from faith. Science is the opposite of faith, and
> therefore a scientific mindset is the opposite to accepting salvation.
>
> We don't need to ape this mindset. We don't need to find a scientific
> theory of Creationism. I am not interested in whether what I believe
> about the creation of the world pleases so-called scientific method or
> not.
>
> Uncle Davey
Scientific theories are merely descriptions of the natural universe
and its properties, which conform to observations of the natural
universe and its actual properties.
Crafting descriptions of the natural universe which contradict
observations of the natural universe is called "imagination".
Crafting descriptions of the natural universe which contradict
observations of the natural universe, then claiming through faith that
your imaginary universe is more true than the observed one is called
"delusional".
Dave
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|