Re: We win by innovation, not by protectionism (alt.fan.uncle-davey)

2004/01/24 11:37

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "la n." <nilita2004nospam@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: We win by innovation, not by protectionism
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 10:37:41 -0800
Lines: 145
Message-ID: <buudhp$lg23b$1@ID-138339.news.uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: d64-180-57-141.bchsia.telus.net (64.180.57.141)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1074968953 22546539 64.180.57.141 ([138339])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1789

< I'm extending the courtesy of adding ud's group since it
behooves me to allow him to know that you gossipy old
hens are going on about him >

"Allisson" <allisson@panix.com> wrote in message
news:buucd0$dac$1@panix5.panix.com...
> In article <busepi$ll4ek$1@ID-138339.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> la n. <nilita2004nospam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Ilya Shambat" <ibshambat2004@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:aa347590.0401231456.6960860e@posting.google.com...
> >> suse@pghmail.com (suse) wrote in message
> >news:<8b44430f.0401221903.53ab34ad@posting.google.com>...
> >> > i'm a bit less impressed with 'uncle davey' than ilya and nilo are.
> >> >
> >> > sure, he's articulate, but he's also a flaming hypocrite. someone who
> >> > preaches from the bible, chapter and verse, maybe should be home with
> >> > his 1st wife and kids in england instead of whoring around europe.
> >>
> >> England is stagnant, Eastern Europe is rising. Being a part of Eastern
> >> Europe's expansion and using one's talents to improve the state of
> >> being of Eastern Europeans is most certainly a better use of one's
> >> time than languishing in a stagnant but snotty state.
>
> From what I recall, Davey was quite happy with that state, as
> long as the Tories were running the show. IIRC, he had a nice
> home and all the perks of the upper-middle-class Oxbridgian
> professional.  Of course, he saw little problem with exploiting
> the advantages of the emerging economies of Poland and Russia.
>
> >> > instead he whined about his controlling (ex) mother-in-law, and then,
> >> > when he found a prostitute who was sufficiently nubile for his
tastes,
> >> > finally found the balls to divorce his wife officially and start a
> >> > "new" life with the his rescue project. baby in the works from the
> >> > start; screw the kids from the former marriage.
> >>
> >> I will ask him what arrangement he has with his former spouse.
>
> Well, according to him (<ak5vk1$epe$0@pita.alt.net>), he had
> a fifteen month old son when he finally married her. And when
> he was negotiating his divorce, don't know if it's been finalized,
> (<ak50um$u8e$0@pita.alt.net>) he:
>
> <Begin quote from above article:>
> I'm offering 67% of property and being taken for 95%,
> I'm offering pound for pound matching the post tax income she makes
> per month if she only goes out to work, subject to a maximum of 20,000
> USD per year, and I'm being taken for paying that kind of money
> without her neeing to lift a finger, but rather keep on with a bad
> example of how to live by scrounging off the state.
>
> Her expectations are unreal in my view, and so I was advised at the
> outset buy my lawyers, but now suddenly they wanna bring a barrister
> into the picture to get councils view on whether her claim is
> reasonanle or not.
>
> Her lawyers are trying to spin it out for all they're worth.
>
> I already spent over 18,000 USD on lawyers fees on this matter and am
> nowhere further forward than if I had done everything without a
> lawyer.
>
> <end quote>
>
> >> It is
> >> my firm belief that people should not get married until they have
> >> become established, for otherwise the partner constantly treats one as
> >> though one were the powerless person they were when they got married &
> >> sabotages whatever success they may achieve.
> >>
> >> > just for the record, this is information i garnered from his poasts
in
> >> > soc.singles. google furiously for it; i won't provide references. if
> >> > you choose to believe in your deity, go for it; i won't argue. i
think
> >> > davey is shit, and given the susceptibility to spin of some rather
> >> > vocal contributors to this froup (as in nilo), maybe those
> >> > contributors want to do some more homework. only reason i posted.
> >> >
> >> > btw, "formerly occultist" is news to me, but makes sense. davey
> >> > doesn't work on rational. maybe that's why ilya and nilo like him.
> >>
> >> F*ck you with your rational bullcrap. Miracles abound, and until you
> >> recognize that is so you will continue to be as clueless as Dan.
> >
> >What suse wrote is very ugly, and Uncle Davey is not here to
> >defend himself.
>
> What Suse wrote is based on Davey's own writings.  I seem
> to recall that even Steve Chaney had difficulty with his
> story.
>
> >I know Davey's story way better than suse
> >has portrayed it;
>
> It's not terribly different from what he posted; unless
> of course, he's recanting or recharacterizing the story.
> This was the man who used to post about the number of
> brothels he'd visited and prostitutes of whom he had
> carnal knowledge.
>
> However, I do know that Davey did feel strongly about his
> children but that the 'ex' was making custody/visitation
> difficult.
>
> >and, regardless, who is anybody *here* to
> >call another person *shit*.  Maybe suse would like to tell
> >the gentle audience why she considers herself to be superior
> >to Davey ... or Ilya ... or me for that matter.
>
> Perhaps because some people view those who have paid prostitutes
> and/or kept mistresses as somewhat lacking in emotional capacity.
> I believe that Davey's rational for prostitutes was that it
> was an efficient use of money versus his time.

So that makes him "shit", if indeed what you say is true.
It is not lost on the gentle readership that Davey busted *you*
on some of your own shite.

>
> As for Ilya, shrug, I can think of better things to read than
> his hackneyed attempts at recharacterizing spiritualism, gnosis,
> et al under the mantle of "New Age" twaddle.

Like dirt true-or-not about people who no longer
participate here ... hmmmm?

>
> Allisson
>
>
> --
> -
> Nothing is easier than self-deceit. For what each man wishes, that he
> also believes to be true. DEMOSTHENES

la n.

"One should examine oneself for a very long time before
thinking of condemning others."  ~Moliere

Follow-ups:

Prev.

Article List

Favorite