Piorokrat wrote:
>Uzytkownik "Larry Trask" <larryt@sussex.ac.uk> napisal w wiadomosci
>news:48c7f19.0309020436.7ce64da@posting.google.com...
>
>
>>"Paavo P" <etunimi.keskinimi.takanimi@kone.fi> wrote in message
>>
>>
>news:<y_I4b.1164$g4.23064@news2.nokia.com>...
>
>
>>>>Not so. Esperanto has no advantages at all. It has no established
>>>>community of speakers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>yes it has
>>>
>>>
>>Not in one place. There is no city, town or village in the world
>>where you can go to be surrounded by Esperanto-speakers.
>>
>>
>
>That would be possible to arrange in theory. It would take a very big
>investment of money and faith but if an island were bought and some real
>estate development done there so that those wishing to have esperanto
>holidays could all go there, then there would be an island where the
>functioning language would be esperanto. It could then gradually develop
the
>other media, such as its own radio station, newspaper, etc, in Esperanto
.
>The language is already ready for such developments, it is only because
>esperanto started life after the diaspora of esperantists that they do n
ot
>exist in the way you describe. The closest thing to an international
>community in Esperanto is soc.culture.esperanto.
>
>
There was an Esperantoland project some years ago. I don't know what
happened to it.
Esperantists should then decide to have their vacation at the same place
at the same time. Some Greek island, for instance. Then they would in
some month Esperanticize the whole Island. They would of course have to
return the next year, but the year after that they could go somewhere els
e.
|
|