alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: To all earlier responders Ladny Tylek & Takdalej
Uncle Davey (noway@jose.com) 2004/01/03 06:05

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: To all earlier responders
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 13:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Ladny Tylek & Takdalej
Lines: 116
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <bt6eqq$h2t$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
References: <BmTIb.35848$Vs3.16793@twister.socal.rr.com> <3MYIb.44477$dP1.178333@newsc.telia.net> <SH%Ib.36352$Vs3.31790@twister.socal.rr.com> <vv95u3s8369b1d@corp.supernews.com> <If1Jb.3562$ml6.833@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <bt2buf$7t8$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <6di9vvkcg81vrb5btrt3n6hmlc8fhiagqp@4ax.com> <3ff4ec31_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3oo0$7dc$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3ff575dd$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de> <bt4oe7$s14$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3ff61971_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt59es$4oq$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3ff64b7f_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1073135126 82463 128.100.83.246 (3 Jan 2004 13:05:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 13:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pa53.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at TP Internet
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox3.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Dec 3 2003 15:07:19, 0.7/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 88193 i03D7Ucw090629 mailbox3.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1592




> Uncle Davey wrote:
>


> >
> >>Uncle Davey wrote:
> >>
> >>

> >>>news:bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl...
> >>>>
> >>>>


> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Uncle Davey wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I've already retracted the moon dust on the advice of other
> >>>
> >>>Christians
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>HAve you said the words for me yet "the creationists were wrong" . .
.
> >>>
> >>>?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>Sure we could have been wrong, we're not infallible. Just like you
lot.
> >>>>
> >>>>Not "could have been", Are wrong.   The difference between
creationists
> >>>
> >>>and
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>genuine scientists, is that scientists can admit to being wrong, and
> >>>
> >>>retract
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>claims that have proven to be wrong.   Being proven wrong is part and
> >>>
> >>>parcel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>of science, and is how science advances.   Creationists rarely admit
to
> >>>>being wrong, and almost never retract false claims.
> >>>>
> >>>>snipping
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>Are you incapable of doing research on your own?  Or do you need to
be
> >>>>>>spoon-fed all your thoughts by "fellow Christians".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>What do you think I'm here for?
> >>>>
> >>>>The Galapagos Pale Ale at the Panda's Thumb?
> >>>>
> >>>>DJT
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Is that a giant panda or a red panda?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>"The creationists were wrong".
> >>
> >>Come on, Davey.  I want to hear you say it.
> >>
> >>
> >>It won't kill you.   Honest, it won't.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Giant or red?
> >
> > Uncle Davey, how do I know they weren't right after all?
>
>
>
>
>
> Because the moon is still there, Davey, and there still ain't no dust on
it.
>
>
> Idiot.

And what a circular argument that is.

And don't call me an idiot. You're not qualified.

Uncle Davey, you don't deliver pizzas.



Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889
90919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119
120121122123
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite