Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: boikat@bellsouth.net (Boikat)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: To all earlier responders
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 03:38:46 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 43
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <abdf273b.0401021939.500cccc6@posting.google.com>
References: <BmTIb.35848$Vs3.16793@twister.socal.rr.com> <3MYIb.44477$dP1.178333@newsc.telia.net> <SH%Ib.36352$Vs3.31790@twister.socal.rr.com> <vv95u3s8369b1d@corp.supernews.com> <If1Jb.3562$ml6.833@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <bt2buf$7t8$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <6di9vvkcg81vrb5btrt3n6hmlc8fhiagqp@4ax.com> <3ff4ec31_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3oo0$7dc$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1073101126 69975 128.100.83.246 (3 Jan 2004 03:38:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 03:38:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.79.207.207
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox5.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Oct 30 2003 22:20:52, 0.0/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 68104 i033eiwm076583 mailbox5.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1583
"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message news:<bt3oo0$7dc$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>...
> > Bible Bob wrote:
> >
> >
> > >>If I were a netkop, which I'm not, I'd be researching supernews' forgery
> > >>policy right now....
> > >>
> > >>Uncle Davey
> > >>
> > >
> > > Good work Uncle Davey
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes. See what happens when you do some elementary research before
> posting?
> >
> > Shoulda done that before you yammered ignorantly about the "moon dust"
> > and the "we only use ten percent of our brains", huh.
> >
>
> I've already retracted the moon dust on the advice of other Christians, I
> was just pointing out that some, including my pastor, still isn't buying the
> retraction.
>
Just out of curiosity, you say you retracted your moon dust on the
advice of other Christians. Does that mean you only retract errors
when they are pointed out by Christians, but not if they are pointed
out by an agnostic or an atheist, even if they offered the same
advice?
> As for the percentage of brain use, so far, unless I missed something, there
> has been only anecdotal, journalistic evidence put up by the total use side.
>
> Uncle Davey
Boikat
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 |
|