Uncle Davey wrote:
<snip>
>>
>>Davey,
>>
>>You quit too soon. Read the rest. For me, the MRI info was
>>interesting as a foundation for seeing how brain structure can be
>>imaged; taken with the rest, it seems a fair introduction to the
>>brain, albeit this was specific to structure. More info on
>>function is in the subsequent links. If you're looking for some
>>pithy quotes to prove a case, try the second link. If you are
>>interested in a broader discussion of brain structurally and
>>functionally, the links work well together.
>>
>>I'm interested that you seem quick to attribute bad motives to
>>Dana (and perhaps others here). You aren't always this quick on
>>the trigger, are you?
>>
>>Tom McDonald
>>
>
>
> No, and at first I trusted Dana more than most others, but she has really
> sat on the fence on this Michael Clark issue, whilst some, such as yourself
> and Ernest Major, have shown integrity and of course I now find that I trust
> Dana less than I did and some others more.
>
> Uncle Davey
Davey,
'He'. Dana's not a 'she'.
And I'm not sure one can use response, or lack of, it to one
issue to judge someone's honesty. Dana gave you good
information. Weigh that, too.
Tom McDonald
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 |
|