> Uncle Davey wrote:
>
> > He was of the opinion that Asimov said that he predicted the first space
> > shuttle would sink into the dust, which is something no doubt you can
> > confirm or deny. If Asomov said it, not us, then clearly it seemed
> > reasonable to him at the time.
> >
>
>
>
>
> Asimov has been dead for decades, Davey. And scientists back in 1967
> knew there was no deep moon dust. So at best, your dumbass pastor is
> ignorantly parroting something that is a minimum of 37 years old.
>
>
> It speaks volumes of you that you even remotely considered this a
> reliable source of science information.
>
By your own words, why are his opinions less valid than science's, or the
boy who delivers pizzas to our office?
>
>
> >
> > I've read that, it's a paper on working towards a co-operative framework
for
> > MRI brain scans. The quality percentages here are nothing to do with the
> > amount of the human brain that is used, but about the efficiency of the
> > brain scanning system. I couldn't read anything about the amount of
brain
> > power being used in the entire article.
> >
> > I can only assume that you gave me this believing I wouldn't read it. It
> > seems to me that you are being unethical with the evidence. We saw some
nice
> > ethics from your colleague Michael Clark the other day and I thought you
at
> > least were above this.
> >
> > Now first before I take the trouble to read one of the other three links
> > please confirn that they actually have something to do with proving
brain
> > power used and are not just a pure cynical attrition tactic like the
first
> > one seems to be.
>
>
>
> <sigh> Davey, we use our cerebral hemispheres.
>
> Those make up over half the brain.
>
> Therefore we use more than 10% of our brain.
>
> See how easy this is?
>
>
>
>
> But hey, if you disagree, please feel free to tell us which part of our
> brain we do NOT use. Is it the amygdala? The pituitary? The
> peduncles? The corpus callosum? Together, those make up more than 10%
> of our brain.
>
Your rhetoric does not prove that we fire more than 10% of the available
combinations of synapses in the cerebral cortex. Please demonstrate that we
do.
> PLEASE keep posting, Davey. You do a much better job than I ever could
> of demonstrating how utterly pig-ignorant creationists really are, and
> how they really are nothing but self-righteous arrogant pricks who think
> they're so much more holy than everyone else.
>
>
Actually, your rhetoric just now did the same for your side, but you seem
pretty oblivious to that.
And I don't wanna be self-righteous. I want Someone Else to be my imputed
Righteousness, not myself. My own righteousness is so crap it doesn't bear
speaking about.
Filthy rags, I'm tellin ya.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 |
|