Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: To all earlier responders
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 02:27:34 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Ladny Tylek & Takdalej
Lines: 82
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <bt59es$4oq$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
References: <BmTIb.35848$Vs3.16793@twister.socal.rr.com> <3MYIb.44477$dP1.178333@newsc.telia.net> <SH%Ib.36352$Vs3.31790@twister.socal.rr.com> <vv95u3s8369b1d@corp.supernews.com> <If1Jb.3562$ml6.833@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <bt2buf$7t8$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <6di9vvkcg81vrb5btrt3n6hmlc8fhiagqp@4ax.com> <3ff4ec31_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3oo0$7dc$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3ff575dd$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de> <bt4oe7$s14$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3ff61971_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1073096854 68454 128.100.83.246 (3 Jan 2004 02:27:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 02:27:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pl187.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at TP Internet
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox3.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Dec 3 2003 15:07:19, 0.7/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 40949 i032TVIg050668 mailbox3.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1578
> Uncle Davey wrote:
>
> > news:bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> >>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> >>news:bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl...
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>Uncle Davey wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I've already retracted the moon dust on the advice of other
> >
> > Christians
> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>HAve you said the words for me yet "the creationists were wrong" . . .
> >
> > ?
> >
> >>>>
> >>>Sure we could have been wrong, we're not infallible. Just like you lot.
> >>
> >>Not "could have been", Are wrong. The difference between creationists
> >
> > and
> >
> >>genuine scientists, is that scientists can admit to being wrong, and
> >
> > retract
> >
> >>claims that have proven to be wrong. Being proven wrong is part and
> >
> > parcel
> >
> >>of science, and is how science advances. Creationists rarely admit to
> >>being wrong, and almost never retract false claims.
> >>
> >>snipping
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Are you incapable of doing research on your own? Or do you need to be
> >>>>spoon-fed all your thoughts by "fellow Christians".
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>What do you think I'm here for?
> >>
> >>The Galapagos Pale Ale at the Panda's Thumb?
> >>
> >>DJT
> >>
> >
> >
> > Is that a giant panda or a red panda?
> >
>
>
> "The creationists were wrong".
>
> Come on, Davey. I want to hear you say it.
>
>
> It won't kill you. Honest, it won't.
>
>
Giant or red?
Uncle Davey, how do I know they weren't right after all? Science changes
it's mind one way, it can change back again.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 |
|