Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: To all earlier responders
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 01:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
Lines: 88
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <3ff61971_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
References: <BmTIb.35848$Vs3.16793@twister.socal.rr.com> <3MYIb.44477$dP1.178333@newsc.telia.net> <SH%Ib.36352$Vs3.31790@twister.socal.rr.com> <vv95u3s8369b1d@corp.supernews.com> <If1Jb.3562$ml6.833@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <bt2buf$7t8$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <6di9vvkcg81vrb5btrt3n6hmlc8fhiagqp@4ax.com> <3ff4ec31_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3oo0$7dc$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3ff575dd$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de> <bt4oe7$s14$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1073092865 67112 128.100.83.246 (3 Jan 2004 01:21:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 01:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <bt4oe7$s14$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.234.67.243
X-Comments: This message was posted through <A href
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone,
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
X-Comments3: <A href ="http://www.newsgroups.com">Visit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2004 01:23:07.0856 (UTC) FILETIME=[24C3ED00:01C3D198]
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1572
Uncle Davey wrote:
> news:bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
>>news:bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl...
>>
>>>
>>>>Uncle Davey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I've already retracted the moon dust on the advice of other
>
> Christians
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>HAve you said the words for me yet "the creationists were wrong" . . .
>
> ?
>
>>>>
>>>Sure we could have been wrong, we're not infallible. Just like you lot.
>>
>>Not "could have been", Are wrong. The difference between creationists
>
> and
>
>>genuine scientists, is that scientists can admit to being wrong, and
>
> retract
>
>>claims that have proven to be wrong. Being proven wrong is part and
>
> parcel
>
>>of science, and is how science advances. Creationists rarely admit to
>>being wrong, and almost never retract false claims.
>>
>>snipping
>>
>>
>>>>Are you incapable of doing research on your own? Or do you need to be
>>>>spoon-fed all your thoughts by "fellow Christians".
>>>>
>>>
>>>What do you think I'm here for?
>>
>>The Galapagos Pale Ale at the Panda's Thumb?
>>
>>DJT
>>
>
>
> Is that a giant panda or a red panda?
>
"The creationists were wrong".
Come on, Davey. I want to hear you say it.
It won't kill you. Honest, it won't.
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 |
|