alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: To all earlier responders Ladny Tylek & Takdalej
Uncle Davey (noway@jose.com) 2004/01/02 14:37

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: To all earlier responders
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Ladny Tylek & Takdalej
Lines: 53
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <bt4oe7$s14$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
References: <BmTIb.35848$Vs3.16793@twister.socal.rr.com> <3MYIb.44477$dP1.178333@newsc.telia.net> <SH%Ib.36352$Vs3.31790@twister.socal.rr.com> <vv95u3s8369b1d@corp.supernews.com> <If1Jb.3562$ml6.833@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <bt2buf$7t8$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <6di9vvkcg81vrb5btrt3n6hmlc8fhiagqp@4ax.com> <3ff4ec31_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3oo0$7dc$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <3ff575dd$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1073079426 62599 128.100.83.246 (2 Jan 2004 21:37:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pb9.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at TP Internet
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox7.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Oct 30 2003 22:20:52, 0.7/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 59361 i02Ld3ZL066366 mailbox7.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1559



news:bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> news:bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl...
> >


> > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I've already retracted the moon dust on the advice of other
Christians
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > HAve you said the words for me yet "the creationists were wrong" . . .
?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Sure we could have been wrong, we're not infallible. Just like you lot.
>
> Not "could have been", Are wrong.   The difference between creationists
and
> genuine scientists, is that scientists can admit to being wrong, and
retract
> claims that have proven to be wrong.   Being proven wrong is part and
parcel
> of science, and is how science advances.   Creationists rarely admit to
> being wrong, and almost never retract false claims.
>
> snipping
>
> > > Are you incapable of doing research on your own?  Or do you need to be
> > > spoon-fed all your thoughts by "fellow Christians".
> > >
> >
> > What do you think I'm here for?
>
> The Galapagos Pale Ale at the Panda's Thumb?
>
> DJT
>

Is that a giant panda or a red panda?

Uncle Davey



Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889
90919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119
120121122123
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite