news:bt4f14$38fd4$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> news:bt3v0p$bhs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl...
> >
> > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I've already retracted the moon dust on the advice of other
Christians
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > HAve you said the words for me yet "the creationists were wrong" . . .
?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Sure we could have been wrong, we're not infallible. Just like you lot.
>
> Not "could have been", Are wrong. The difference between creationists
and
> genuine scientists, is that scientists can admit to being wrong, and
retract
> claims that have proven to be wrong. Being proven wrong is part and
parcel
> of science, and is how science advances. Creationists rarely admit to
> being wrong, and almost never retract false claims.
>
> snipping
>
> > > Are you incapable of doing research on your own? Or do you need to be
> > > spoon-fed all your thoughts by "fellow Christians".
> > >
> >
> > What do you think I'm here for?
>
> The Galapagos Pale Ale at the Panda's Thumb?
>
> DJT
>
Is that a giant panda or a red panda?
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 |
|