alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: To all earlier responders University of Ediacara
Ernest Major ({$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk) 2004/01/02 12:21

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: To all earlier responders
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 19:21:42 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 13
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <Xy1pqLA0Tc9$EwMy@meden.demon.co.uk>
References: <BmTIb.35848$Vs3.16793@twister.socal.rr.com><3MYIb.44477$dP1.178333@newsc.telia.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1073071302 60098 128.100.83.246 (2 Jan 2004 19:21:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 19:21:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Turnpike Integrated Version 4.02 S <HqM9aSlMKPAGBRMnG2JsTbnGUV>
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1557

In article <bt3oo0$7dc$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>, Uncle Davey
<noway@jose.com> writes
>
>As for the percentage of brain use, so far, unless I missed something, there
>has been only anecdotal, journalistic evidence put up by the total use side.
>
As someone has already mentioned, brain scans (it possible to use some
version of scan to detect actively metabolising brain regions) have
shown that (effectively) all the brain is used. What does appear to be
true is that we do use all of the brain, but not all at once.
--
alias Ernest Major


Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889
90919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119
120121122123
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite