Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Charles C." <charles_casey@opt_online.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Salvation by faith or works - which has most scriptures to backitup in the NT?
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 02:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Optimum Online
Lines: 55
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <ohl1vv4cdr3kvb7hsgqrl0mn19n54q507v@4ax.com>
References: <brsvkk$hbj$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl><r534uvoennq2o43epa23ugldq4rmv47e0c@4ax.com>
Reply-To: charles_casey@opt_online.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1072749709 61302 128.100.83.246 (30 Dec 2003 02:01:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 02:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
X-Spamscanner: mailbox1.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Oct 30 2003 22:20:52, 0.0/5.0 2.60)
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 11383 hBU236RK014612 mailbox1.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1502
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:09:40 +0000 (UTC), "Piorokrat"
<piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
<SNIP>
>> And I'll tell you right now why you CV, Davey, Mr. Wizard, or whatever
>> else you want to be called, are going to fail.
>
>You're trying to pick a fight with me because someone else has trodden on
>your toes.
>
>If I want a fight with you I'm quite able to handle it without assumed
>personae.
>
>You have no reason to assume Constance is anything other than she says she
>is.
>
>Kindly don't draw me in to your battles.
>
>Now as to Antrinomianism, I don't see anyone preaching antinomianism.
>Christians are to seek to please God. They don't get saved that way, though.
>To get saved in your own works would mean that you would need perfect works.
>I wouldn't begin to qualify and neither would anyone else, other than
>Christ, who did qualify, with flying colours. "Christ died for sinners, the
>just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God". If we can come alone,
>then what was He thinking of?
>
>If someone puts up no fight against sin, sure they need to assume something
>went wrong with their new birth and start over.
>
>If someone sometimes fails in the fight against sin, they should not be
>surprised. this will happen. We get back on the path again, and God responds
>always favourably to our repentance, which is what he promises to do.
>
>I don't see anyone preaching for Christian pornstars, as you mention in
>another post, but if someone has done that and wishes to repent, than as far
>as I can see they can repent with the expectation of forgiveness.
>
>And then I have to note that it is a curious thing that you are telling us
>all how to live as Christians when you have given up on the religion
>altogether yourself. I don't see the logic there.
>
>If Christianity is not right then why are you preaching any version of it?
>
>Hmmmmmmn?
>
Nice strawmen you set up.
Maybe you should read the complete threads before you spew.
Charles
Remove the underscores to contact me.
Creationism: Sci-Fi for the soul
|
|