On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:09:40 +0000 (UTC), "Piorokrat"
<piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
<SNIP>
>> And I'll tell you right now why you CV, Davey, Mr. Wizard, or whatever
>> else you want to be called, are going to fail.
>
>You're trying to pick a fight with me because someone else has trodden on
>your toes.
>
>If I want a fight with you I'm quite able to handle it without assumed
>personae.
>
>You have no reason to assume Constance is anything other than she says she
>is.
>
>Kindly don't draw me in to your battles.
>
>Now as to Antrinomianism, I don't see anyone preaching antinomianism.
>Christians are to seek to please God. They don't get saved that way, though.
>To get saved in your own works would mean that you would need perfect works.
>I wouldn't begin to qualify and neither would anyone else, other than
>Christ, who did qualify, with flying colours. "Christ died for sinners, the
>just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God". If we can come alone,
>then what was He thinking of?
>
>If someone puts up no fight against sin, sure they need to assume something
>went wrong with their new birth and start over.
>
>If someone sometimes fails in the fight against sin, they should not be
>surprised. this will happen. We get back on the path again, and God responds
>always favourably to our repentance, which is what he promises to do.
>
>I don't see anyone preaching for Christian pornstars, as you mention in
>another post, but if someone has done that and wishes to repent, than as far
>as I can see they can repent with the expectation of forgiveness.
>
>And then I have to note that it is a curious thing that you are telling us
>all how to live as Christians when you have given up on the religion
>altogether yourself. I don't see the logic there.
>
>If Christianity is not right then why are you preaching any version of it?
>
>Hmmmmmmn?
>
Nice strawmen you set up.
Maybe you should read the complete threads before you spew.
Charles
Remove the underscores to contact me.
Creationism: Sci-Fi for the soul
|
|