alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: David Horn's Fish BB international
Constance Vigilant (anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com) 2003/12/29 17:20

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Constance Vigilant" <anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: David Horn's Fish
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:20:34 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BB international
Lines: 133
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <bsqgf2$42n$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <RZlGb.21052$C87.492@twister.socal.rr.com> <273ab496.0312261008.31f5ae8f@posting.google.com> <Xns945DBCF0B1B50doldridgsprintca@24.69.255.211> <bB7Hb.29390$nG3.8523@twister.socal.rr.com> <pan.2003.12.27.04.44.14.874655@cox.net> <sbeHb.29845$nG3.20648@twister.socal.rr.com> <bsjvae$dut$0@pita.alt.net> <f25544d.0312271928.64e59f0c@posting.google.com> <bsmlul$uv1$0@pita.alt.net> <3feef69a_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsmu4t$e1f$0@pita.alt.net> <3fef05f9$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsn1gt$kku$0@pita.alt.net> <3fef38ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsq6iq$hba$0@pita.alt.net> <3ff0c0e9$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1072743634 58890 128.100.83.246 (30 Dec 2003 00:20:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:20:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1494


"Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
news:3ff0c0e9$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> Constance Vigilant wrote:
>
> > "Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
> > news:3fef38ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> >
> >>Constance Vigilant wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>I supposed it's quicker to answer it again.
> >>>
> >>>I am speaking my own opinions, as a human being. If they are better or
> >
> > worse
> >
> >>>informed than anyone else's comes out in the wash.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>OK.  So your religious opinions don't mean any more than mine or my
> >>necxt door neighbor's, and you are no more holy or godlike than I am.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Why must you keep tilting at this rhetorical windmill?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Because fundies like you keep claiming to speak on behalf of God.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Perfectly clear --- you have NO reason why your religious opinions are
> >>>>any more authoritative than anyone else's, your religious opinions
> >>>>aren't any closer to God than mine or my veterinarian's, and you don't
> >>>>want to admit it out loud.
> >>>>
> >>>>Seems pretty clear to me.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You've now had it out loud on numerous occasions.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>OK.
> >>
> >>Given that, why should anyone bother to listen to any of your religious
> >>opinions.  All of us can read the Bible (or Koran or Baghavad Gita or
> >>Tao te Ching or Egyptian Book of the Dead) for ourselves.  So what do we
> >>need YOU for.
> >
> >
> > The same as I need you for.
> >
> > We need people who don't agree with us.
>
>
>
>
> Don't agree with us about what.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > If you prefer just books, not people, that's up to you.
>
>
>
>
>
> I haven't noticed myself concersing with any "books" in here.  Have you?
>
>
>
> >
> > That's just my opinion.
> >
> > Quite frankly, I prefer you, Lenny Flank the person, to some book of
Lenny
> > Flank's opinions.
>
>
>
>
>
> Fortunately for me, others disagree with that, which is why each of my
> seven published books has done quite well (although they are, alas, all
> out of print now --- but still available as "used" copies at Amazon.com).
>
>

These ones?

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-form/ref=s_sf_b_as/103-79894
27-8522219

How does being a successful millionaire author make your opinions more valid
than mine, with no qualifications and no publications?

>
>
> >
> > The book of our opinions is being written right here anyway as a
by-product
> > of the human contact.
> >
>
>
>
>
> I find very little that is "human" in your contact, "Constance".
>
>

If I were part Vulcan, no doubt you'd feel differently.

In Love,
Constance Vigilant



Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
30313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite