"Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
news:3ff0c0e9$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> Constance Vigilant wrote:
>
> > "Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
> > news:3fef38ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> >
> >>Constance Vigilant wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>I supposed it's quicker to answer it again.
> >>>
> >>>I am speaking my own opinions, as a human being. If they are better or
> >
> > worse
> >
> >>>informed than anyone else's comes out in the wash.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>OK. So your religious opinions don't mean any more than mine or my
> >>necxt door neighbor's, and you are no more holy or godlike than I am.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Why must you keep tilting at this rhetorical windmill?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Because fundies like you keep claiming to speak on behalf of God.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Perfectly clear --- you have NO reason why your religious opinions are
> >>>>any more authoritative than anyone else's, your religious opinions
> >>>>aren't any closer to God than mine or my veterinarian's, and you don't
> >>>>want to admit it out loud.
> >>>>
> >>>>Seems pretty clear to me.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You've now had it out loud on numerous occasions.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>OK.
> >>
> >>Given that, why should anyone bother to listen to any of your religious
> >>opinions. All of us can read the Bible (or Koran or Baghavad Gita or
> >>Tao te Ching or Egyptian Book of the Dead) for ourselves. So what do we
> >>need YOU for.
> >
> >
> > The same as I need you for.
> >
> > We need people who don't agree with us.
>
>
>
>
> Don't agree with us about what.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > If you prefer just books, not people, that's up to you.
>
>
>
>
>
> I haven't noticed myself concersing with any "books" in here. Have you?
>
>
>
> >
> > That's just my opinion.
> >
> > Quite frankly, I prefer you, Lenny Flank the person, to some book of
Lenny
> > Flank's opinions.
>
>
>
>
>
> Fortunately for me, others disagree with that, which is why each of my
> seven published books has done quite well (although they are, alas, all
> out of print now --- but still available as "used" copies at Amazon.com).
>
>
These ones?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-form/ref=s_sf_b_as/103-79894
27-8522219
How does being a successful millionaire author make your opinions more valid
than mine, with no qualifications and no publications?
>
>
> >
> > The book of our opinions is being written right here anyway as a
by-product
> > of the human contact.
> >
>
>
>
>
> I find very little that is "human" in your contact, "Constance".
>
>
If I were part Vulcan, no doubt you'd feel differently.
In Love,
Constance Vigilant
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |
|