Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Constance Vigilant" <anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: David Horn's Fish
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:15:21 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BB international
Lines: 45
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <bsqg58$3h8$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <RZlGb.21052$C87.492@twister.socal.rr.com> <273ab496.0312261008.31f5ae8f@posting.google.com> <Xns945DBCF0B1B50doldridgsprintca@24.69.255.211> <bB7Hb.29390$nG3.8523@twister.socal.rr.com> <pan.2003.12.27.04.44.14.874655@cox.net> <sbeHb.29845$nG3.20648@twister.socal.rr.com> <bsjvae$dut$0@pita.alt.net> <3fedb19d$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsl1so$pud$0@pita.alt.net> <slrnbusk6l.1qo.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem> <35fa3772.0312280651.56c1e8e1@posting.google.com> <slrnbuu633.1c8.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem> <bsos76$q3k$1@news.onet.pl> <3ff00345$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <ZE0Ib.33162$Sf1.220210@zonnet-reader-1> <3ff0c044$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1072743321 58784 128.100.83.246 (30 Dec 2003 00:15:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:15:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox7.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Oct 30 2003 22:20:52, 0.7/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 20795 hBU0Ge4m021468 mailbox7.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1493
First science officer "Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
news:3ff0c044$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> Ariaan wrote:
>
> > Lenny Flank wrote:
> >
> >>Piorokrat wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>This appears to have started with David Horn challenging Dr Gastrich
> >>>to a discussion of Rift Valley Cichlids, then Constance calling on
> >>>my authority as an ichthyologist
> >>
> >>
> >>You are not an ichthyologist. Your opinion on ichthyology is no more
> >>authoritative than your opinion about theology.
> >
> >
> > Where's your sense of humour?
>
>
>
>
>
> It leaves the second someone either (1) tries to tell me that their
> religious opinions are more authoritative than anyone else's, or (2)
> tries to lie to people by claiming their religious opinions are really
> "science".
>
> I find nothing remotely humorous about either of those situations.
>
>
>
>
> By the way, how many damn sock puppets do you HAVE?
>
>
Talk Dutch to him, Ariaan!
In Love,
Constance Vigilant
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |
|