"Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
news:3fef3a87$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> Constance Vigilant wrote:
>
> > "catshark" <catshark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:sb2uuvs1rh1285t4r75lgn8f7u6j5jaaib@4ax.com...
> >
> >>On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 15:36:01 +0000 (UTC), Lenny Flank
> >><lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>[snip]
> >>
> >>
> >>>Now, let's hear from all those who have been convinced, even slightly,
> >>>that "Constance" makes all "Christinas" look like uneducated nutters,
> >>>and who have been driven AWAY from Christianity, even a tiny little
> >>>butty bit, by "Constance" . . . . . .
> >>
> >>I've skipped most of her posts but, for what its worth, her toadying to
> >>Jason and her effusive praise of that AiG bafflegarp he produced about a
> >>"theory of creation" was enough to convince me.
> >
> >
> > To convince you of what? That the Bible has errors?
>
>
>
>
> It DOES ???!!!???? Does "Dr" Gastrich know this ????!!!?????!!!
>
>
>
> Hey "Doc", your sycophant sockpuppet thinks the Bible is WRONG about
> something!!!!!! Aren't you going to give him your Holy Judgement and
> damn him to eternal Hell?
>
>
I asked what my person and your dislike of me have convinced you of.
I didn't say the Bible has errors.
If I was using a language that had subjunctives, I would have put that verb
in the subjunctive. Modern English doesn't. It's the law.
>
>
> >
> > What about the fact that I got into an argument with another Christian
> > sticking up for you and trying to be fair to you today? Didn't that
convince
> > you in the other direction at all?
> >
> > Your rotten ingratitude and bias
>
>
>
>
> "Ingratitude"? Are you of the opinion that someone actually owes you
> "gratitude"?
>
All right. I shouldn't have written that.
>
>
>
> , and Lenny's constant asking of irrelevant
> > questions
>
>
>
>
> "Irrelevant"? Asking someone who claims to be a "messenger of God" WHY
> he is a "messenger of God" is . . . an "irrelevant question"?
>
I never called myself that.
>
>
>
> have served to convince me that Athirstism and whatever Lenny
> > believes in, even though he won't say what it is, is 100% wrong.
> >
>
>
>
>
> Fine. Believe whatever you want. <shrug>
>
> Just don't demand that the rest of the world beleive it too.
>
>
>
>
>
> > That's just my opinion, in case I get asked the stupid question again.
>
>
>
>
> Ands your opinion doesn't mean didldey doo, since you're not God and
> you're not a better Christian than anyone else is.
>
And why does your opinion of me count for more than diddley doo?
You're no better a singer/songwriter than your namesake Lenny Cohen.
> Hence your Judgement upon the matter means . . . well. . . nothing.
> <shrug>
>
Hallelujah.
In Love,
Constance Vigilant
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
|