Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Constance Vigilant" <anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: David Horn's Fish
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:31:59 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BB international
Lines: 74
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <bsq6iq$hba$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <RZlGb.21052$C87.492@twister.socal.rr.com> <273ab496.0312261008.31f5ae8f@posting.google.com> <Xns945DBCF0B1B50doldridgsprintca@24.69.255.211> <bB7Hb.29390$nG3.8523@twister.socal.rr.com> <pan.2003.12.27.04.44.14.874655@cox.net> <sbeHb.29845$nG3.20648@twister.socal.rr.com> <bsjvae$dut$0@pita.alt.net> <f25544d.0312271928.64e59f0c@posting.google.com> <bsmlul$uv1$0@pita.alt.net> <3feef69a_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsmu4t$e1f$0@pita.alt.net> <3fef05f9$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsn1gt$kku$0@pita.alt.net> <3fef38ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1072733519 55207 128.100.83.246 (29 Dec 2003 21:31:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:31:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1475
"Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
news:3fef38ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> Constance Vigilant wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I supposed it's quicker to answer it again.
> >
> > I am speaking my own opinions, as a human being. If they are better or
worse
> > informed than anyone else's comes out in the wash.
>
>
>
>
> OK. So your religious opinions don't mean any more than mine or my
> necxt door neighbor's, and you are no more holy or godlike than I am.
>
>
>
> >
> > Why must you keep tilting at this rhetorical windmill?
>
>
>
>
> Because fundies like you keep claiming to speak on behalf of God.
>
>
>
> >>Perfectly clear --- you have NO reason why your religious opinions are
> >>any more authoritative than anyone else's, your religious opinions
> >>aren't any closer to God than mine or my veterinarian's, and you don't
> >>want to admit it out loud.
> >>
> >>Seems pretty clear to me.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > You've now had it out loud on numerous occasions.
>
>
>
>
>
> OK.
>
> Given that, why should anyone bother to listen to any of your religious
> opinions. All of us can read the Bible (or Koran or Baghavad Gita or
> Tao te Ching or Egyptian Book of the Dead) for ourselves. So what do we
> need YOU for.
The same as I need you for.
We need people who don't agree with us.
If you prefer just books, not people, that's up to you.
That's just my opinion.
Quite frankly, I prefer you, Lenny Flank the person, to some book of Lenny
Flank's opinions.
The book of our opinions is being written right here anyway as a by-product
of the human contact.
In Love,
Constance Vigilant
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |
|