"Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
news:3fef38ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> Constance Vigilant wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I supposed it's quicker to answer it again.
> >
> > I am speaking my own opinions, as a human being. If they are better or
worse
> > informed than anyone else's comes out in the wash.
>
>
>
>
> OK. So your religious opinions don't mean any more than mine or my
> necxt door neighbor's, and you are no more holy or godlike than I am.
>
>
>
> >
> > Why must you keep tilting at this rhetorical windmill?
>
>
>
>
> Because fundies like you keep claiming to speak on behalf of God.
>
>
>
> >>Perfectly clear --- you have NO reason why your religious opinions are
> >>any more authoritative than anyone else's, your religious opinions
> >>aren't any closer to God than mine or my veterinarian's, and you don't
> >>want to admit it out loud.
> >>
> >>Seems pretty clear to me.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > You've now had it out loud on numerous occasions.
>
>
>
>
>
> OK.
>
> Given that, why should anyone bother to listen to any of your religious
> opinions. All of us can read the Bible (or Koran or Baghavad Gita or
> Tao te Ching or Egyptian Book of the Dead) for ourselves. So what do we
> need YOU for.
The same as I need you for.
We need people who don't agree with us.
If you prefer just books, not people, that's up to you.
That's just my opinion.
Quite frankly, I prefer you, Lenny Flank the person, to some book of Lenny
Flank's opinions.
The book of our opinions is being written right here anyway as a by-product
of the human contact.
In Love,
Constance Vigilant
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |
|