Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3F405996.9040900@nospam.com>
From: Cellus Purfluxius <Jacek@nospam.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: sv,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: don't know the right term...
References: <bhoa3t$1g2k3$1@ID-75561.news.uni-berlin.de> <bhoaqg$en6$1@news.onet.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 30
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:44:06 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.65.172.226
X-Complaints-To: abuse@telia.com
X-Trace: newsc.telia.net 1061181846 213.65.172.226 (Mon, 18 Aug 2003 06:44:06 CEST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 06:44:06 CEST
Organization: Telia Internet
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:134
Piorokrat wrote:
>Uzytkownik "Florian Hess" <hipabos@web.de> napisal w wiadomosci
>news:bhoa3t$1g2k3$1@ID-75561.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>
>>Can anybody tell me what's the right, precise term for the particles
>>used to be put before adjectives/adverbs?
>>
>>=> Lisabeth was VERY/MORE/LESS/PRETTY/LITTLE/etc. beautiful.
>>
>>
>>I'm provisionally using "toner", right so?
>>
>>
>>
>>FLoH.
>>
>>
>
>Intensifiers, that's what they bloody fucking well are.
>
>
Por ke no "adverbs"?
Cellus P.
|
|