psgj@groundlink.net wrote:
> In article <bs028p$6p2$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>,
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1110212,00.html?79%3A+Int
>>ernational+news+%2D+guardian
>>
>>Science breakthrough of the year: proof of our exploding universe
>>
>>Tim Radford, science editor
>>Friday December 19, 2003
>>The Guardian
>>
>
>
> <snip>
>
>>This bizarre force seems to be pushing the universe apart at an
>>accelerating rate, when gravitational pull should be making it slow down or
>>contract.
>>
>
>
> <snip>
>
> I'm confused now. I thought evolution claims that the rate of expansion
> is slowing and eventually will collapse in on itself. This throws into
> question all of the supposed "facts" that evolution has supposedly
> proven.
>
> Pat Jacobs
>
Thanks for once again demonsrtating to everyone that creationists are
too stupid and uneducated to know the difference between "biology" and
"cosmology".
Oh, and they are also too dumb to understand any of the latest
cosmological theories concerning "omega".
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 |
|