On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:47:04 +0000 (UTC), "Piorokrat"
<piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
>We are Creationists, you are Evolutionists, who's gonna make you guys think
>if we don't?
Who is going to make Evolutionists think? Evolutionists are. Many
are scientists and have devoted their lives to making discoveries
about our world.
Do you really think you and Jason are "making evolutionists think"?
>As scientists, you should welcome an opposition, you should even for that
>reason be willing to have both sides presented to kids in class.
Scientists do welcom opposition. Many here in T.O. have been asking
you and the "doctor" serious questions since the first crosspost. You
and Jason remind me of the characters in The Matrix... a hundred
bullets (questions) thrown at you and you two just ducking and weaving
to avoid them.
If a scientist (not a religious member of Answers In Genesis) finds
hard core evidence for a world-wide flood, it'll rock the scientific
world, but year by year, the chances of THAT happening are running
down.
You and Jason, and other Religious Zealots aren't allowed to believe
in evolution because you're entire FAITH is based on a perfect bible
and you having the perfect interpretation of it. You cannot change
your mind about your stances because, if you do, you're entire faith
would come crumbling down. One little "mistake" in your Dogma means
it's no longer perfect, which is what it's ALL based on... perfection.
>
>But Lenny, and others, defend their position with zealous envy, and when any
>Creationist wishing to put the view from the other side comes along they get
>treated as if they were Jehovah's Witnesses or something. I don't call that
>a spirit of scientific enquiry.
People here have been very accomdating to your view. You state it,
people have questions or want proof, you can't supply it, people move
on to more exciting questions. . .
I'm sure that if you bring forward hard scientific data that you
didn't find on AiG or some other non-scientific fundimentalist site,
the people here would seriously look at it.
James, Seattle.
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 |
150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 |
180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 |
210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 |
|