Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Dana Tweedy" <tweedyd@cvn.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: New Light on the first verses of Genesis?
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 01:52:17 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 39
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <bs0abn$8f4ig$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de>
References: <bs028p$6p2$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <psgj-164EFA.20302019122003@news06.east.earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1071885137 12119 128.100.83.246 (20 Dec 2003 01:52:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 01:52:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Orig-NNTP-Posting-Host: user27.net456.oh.sprint-hsd.net (65.40.141.27)
X-Orig-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1071885496 8884816 65.40.141.27 ([35161])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1185
<psgj@groundlink.net> wrote in message
news:psgj-164EFA.20302019122003@news06.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <bs028p$6p2$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>,
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>
> >
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1110212,00.html?79%3A+Int
> > ernational+news+%2D+guardian
> >
> > Science breakthrough of the year: proof of our exploding universe
> >
> > Tim Radford, science editor
> > Friday December 19, 2003
> > The Guardian
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > This bizarre force seems to be pushing the universe apart at an
> > accelerating rate, when gravitational pull should be making it slow down
or
> > contract.
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> I'm confused now. I thought evolution claims that the rate of expansion
> is slowing and eventually will collapse in on itself. This throws into
> question all of the supposed "facts" that evolution has supposedly
> proven.
Evolution says nothing about the rate of expansion of the universe. It
deals only with living organisms, not the universe in general. Also,
nothing in science is ever considered "proven".
DJT
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 |
|