Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "anonymous" <anon@anonanonanon.org>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Archaic English Spelling
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:15:26 +0200
Organization: anonymous
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <bgth66$r3s$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>
References: <3f31d674@news.netos.com>
Reply-To: "anonymous" <non@rien.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wl70.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
X-Trace: nemesis.news.tpi.pl 1060259846 27772 80.50.157.70 (7 Aug 2003 12:37:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@tpi.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:115
news:3f31d674@news.netos.com...
> English includes a number of borrowed words whose spellings are
> unpronounceable, as a result of retention of foreign consonant clusters.
> For example, we have a group borrowed from Greek which begin with "ps'
> psychology, psoriasis; "pt" pterodactyl, etc.. I assume that someone
> decided to preserve the ancient Greek spelling (psi), etc..
>
> However, I'm stumped as to why the Greek "f" sound - presumably a single
> letter "phi" in Greek -- was introduced into English as "ph" (phonetic,
> phrenology, etc..)
>
> Any suggestions?
f is to p what th is to t and sh is to s and kh is to k and gh is to g and
zh is to z.
Do you have an issue with all these consonant+h bundles, or are you just
being prejudicial when it comes to 'ph'?
Girl called Sophie stood you up or what?
Uncle Davey
|
|