alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: Hello T.O. University of Ediacara
Dana Tweedy (tweedyd@cvn.net) 2003/12/18 14:44

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Dana Tweedy" <tweedyd@cvn.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Hello T.O.
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:44:58 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 38
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <brt7fn$7eb0v$1@ID-35161.news.uni-berlin.de>
References: <brh9ov$39qhe$1@ID-137900.news.uni-berlin.de> <wjWCb.16355$HL2.14048@twister.socal.rr.com> <abdf273b.0312141025.4f5f2638@posting.google.com> <ILdDb.6301$Oh1.248@twister.socal.rr.com> <brk149$n9e$5@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu> <brkkbn$6uj$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <brmtke$1cc$1@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu> <brnqra$2r2$1@news.onet.pl> <qja2uv40d899aedd7tnalqohckrgpulg7h@4ax.com> <brsc64$bfv$1@news.onet.pl> <3FE1A633.1020201@pacbell.net> <brt1in$3n6$1@news.onet.pl> <t234uvong8rkf2872cseoc0sn3iam080ij@4ax.com> <FYoEb.2258$Vs3.2012@twister.socal.rr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1071783898 79273 128.100.83.246 (18 Dec 2003 21:44:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:44:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Orig-NNTP-Posting-Host: user59.net630.oh.sprint-hsd.net (65.41.51.59)
X-Orig-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1071784250 7810079 65.41.51.59 ([35161])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1119


"Dr. Jason Gastrich" <news@jcsm.org> wrote in message
news:FYoEb.2258$Vs3.2012@twister.socal.rr.com...
> Mujin wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:04:57 +0000 (UTC), "Piorokrat"
> > <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> Fossils are a point which can be discussed. They are much rarer than
> >> they should be bearing in mind what evolutionists say about the age
> >> of the earth. I tend to believe that they are flood victims.
> >
> > OK, you're right.  This does bear discussion.  Exactly how many
> > fossils are to be expected, and by how much does the number of
> > existing fossils fall short?
>
> If punctualism is true, then we don't need many fossils at all.  Right?

Wrong.

> Punctualism disagrees with Darwinism on this.

No, it doesn't.  Punctuated Equilibrium is in agreement with darwinian
mechanisms.  The difference is that fossilization is imperfect, and in
episodes of fairly rapid evolution, all the intermediates are not going to
be represented.

> IMHO, punctualism was the
> theory that evolutionists put forth after the fossils weren't found.

Not suprisingly, your opinion is wrong.  Many transitional fossils have been
found.  PE deals with the pattern of fossils and why there are relatively
few intermediates between species.

DJT



Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889
90919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119
120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149
150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179
180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209
210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite