alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: Hello T.O. Newsfeeds.com http://www ..
Lenny Flank (lflank_nospam@ij.net) 2003/12/17 17:12
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Lenny Flank <lflank_nospam@ij.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Hello T.O.
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:12:44 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
Lines: 168
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <3fe0f237_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
References: <lbTCb.16305$HL2.15776@twister.socal.rr.com> <ecUCb.6254$qq.560@bignews1.bellsouth.net> <DFUCb.16309$HL2.2582@twister.socal.rr.com> <brh9ov$39qhe$1@ID-137900.news.uni-berlin.de> <wjWCb.16355$HL2.14048@twister.socal.rr.com> <abdf273b.0312141025.4f5f2638@posting.google.com> <ILdDb.6301$Oh1.248@twister.socal.rr.com> <brk149$n9e$5@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu> <brkkbn$6uj$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <brmtke$1cc$1@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu> <brnqra$2r2$1@news.onet.pl> <m5vutvofkooi8b1vvvk7odiun1hdeaj1eu@4ax.com> <brpfd2$4i1$0@pita.alt.net> <3fe05c9f$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <brpqd7$nt4$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1071706364 55736 128.100.83.246 (18 Dec 2003 00:12:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:12:44 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <brpqd7$nt4$0@pita.alt.net>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.234.67.243
X-Comments: This message was posted through <A href
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone,
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
X-Comments3: <A href ="http://www.newsgroups.com">Visit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2003 00:18:19.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[70379780:01C3C4FC]
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1094

Constance Vigilant wrote:

> "Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
> news:3fe05c9f$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
>
>>Constance Vigilant wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"RainLover" <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote in message
>>>news:m5vutvofkooi8b1vvvk7odiun1hdeaj1eu@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:39:40 +0000 (UTC), "Piorokrat"
>>>><piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I'm breeding Xenophorus captivus, which of course is extinct in the
>
> wild
>
>>>>>because the mexicans didn't care about the protection of their habitat.
>>>
>>>If
>>>
>>>
>>>>>aquarists don't keep them alive they will disappear. the problem is
>
> that
>
>>>I
>>>
>>>
>>>>>got mine from Plock zoo, the only strain available in Poland, and it is
>>>>>already so inbred that I have continually behind my back here in the
>>>
>>>office
>>>
>>>
>>>>>a continual reminder of what happens when things in breed. In my
>>>
>>>xenophorus,
>>>
>>>
>>>>>the males are healthy, but every single female, no matter what I do,
>
> has
>
>>>its
>>>
>>>
>>>>>jaws seize up when it achives a certain age, and then it can eat and
>
> dies
>
>>>of
>>>
>>>
>>>>>hunger. Its eyes also start bloating out. Everyone else who has Plock
>
> zoo
>
>>>>>Xenophorus reports the same problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You bring up an excellent point with your xenophorus...
>>>>Scientifically speaking, how would you explain the earth's population
>>>>deriving from ONE man and ONE woman?
>>>>
>>>>How do belivers in ToC explain away the lack of imbreeding?
>>>>
>>>>James, Seattle
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>We would say the all genes had their maximum vigour at the point of
>>>creation. Inbreeding started to become a problem only after the ark, and
>>>maybe only after the diaspora of the Babel civilisation.
>>>
>>>This was when the Bible shows the human life span decreasing. Some say
>
> that
>
>>>its the change from lunar months to years, but that doesn't account for
>
> the
>
>>>gradualness of the change.
>>>
>>>We have inbreeding now, well enough.
>>>
>>>Every new speciation is a weakening of the original stock.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks for sharing your religious opinions with us.
>>
>>Why should anyone pay any more attention to your religious opinions than
>>they should to mine or my nexy door neighbor's or my car mechanic's?
>
>
> Do you, like, think this a good question, or something?




Yes.


>
> You do seem to ask it rather a lot.




That's because nobody seems to want to answer it.  Including you, I see.




>
> You go ahead and post your sexy neighbour's opinions, I don't mind.
>


Is that a sinful thought on your part . . . .?





And you go ahead and make all "Christians" look like uneducated
simple-minded dolts who only ever read one Book in their entire life,
and who live in trailer parks in small southern towns where they marry
close relatives in ceremonies led by Preacher Billy Joe Bob.  <shrug>


PLEASE keep posting, Constance. You do a wonderful job of demonstrating
to everyone jsut how utterly vapid fundies really are.






===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"

Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank

DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation








-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889
90919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119
120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149
150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179
180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209
210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite